World Series Preview

I nailed the Divisional Round of the playoffs with stunning accuracy (for me). I then struck out looking, like Ryan Howard in my LCS predictions. So take this World Series primer with either a grain of salt, or as scripture.

Game 1: Cliff Lee v. Tim Lincecum
Advantage: Rangers. I like the Rangers to win Game 1 easily. I see no reason why Cliff Lee, pitching in an expansive park, against a bunch of free swinging hitters, can’t replicate his playoff success. Lincecum, on the other hand, has the real difficult task of facing the best lineup he’s seen all year. Even the bottom of Texas’ lineup (save for Cliff Lee of course) is hitting over .300 this postseason. It’s a real marquee matchup, but Lee’s track record combined with the lineup he’s facing, wins out. Texas wins 3-0.

Game 2: CJ Wilson v. Matt Cain
Advantage: Rangers. Cain, on the surface, is the logical choice. No one walked more batters in baseball this year than did CJ Wilson. However, the Giants aren’t exactly a bunch of patient hitters. I think Wilson can pitch effectively against the Giants lineup. Cain was phenomenal in his only LCS start against Philadelphia, which will be 9 days ago by the time he toes the rubber. Cain also walks a lot of batters. This Rangers lineup will make him pay for that in a way that San Francisco’s won’t to Wilson. Texas wins 5-3.

Game 3: Jonathan Sanchez v. Colby Lewis
Advantage: Rangers. I don’t expect Colby Lewis to pitch in Game 3 of the World Series like he did in Game 6 of the ALCS, even against the Giants. And I think that Sanchez won’t pitch as poorly in Game 3 of the World Series as he did in Game 6 of the NLCS. This is a really interesting matchup. Two completely dissimilar pitchers facing two dissimilar lineups. The Rangers trot out a lot of right-handed batters and I think that could be an issue for Sanchez, who also gives up a ton of walks and is facing a patient lineup. Texas wins, on a hunch, 7-3.

Game 4: Madison Bumgarner v. Tommy Hunter
Advantage: Giants. Not even close. Giants stay alive 6-2.

Game 5: Tim Lincecum v. Cliff Lee
Advantage: Giants. This is where I think the luster starts to wear off a bit on the Cliff Lee playoff mystique. Again, a hunch, but that’s what all of this stuff is. Lee has always pitched in the postseason under some sort of pressure (Game 1s, a big swing Game 3 at Yankee Stadium, a huge Game 5 at Tampa). Here he is coming in up 3-1, after having shut down the Giants in Game 1. Maybe the fire isn’t there. It will be there for Lincecum. Giants win 3-1.

Game 6: CJ Wilson v. Matt Cain
Advantage: Rangers. Barely. I was very tempted to force this to a seventh game. I didn’t. Rangers win 6-5.

Final Prediction: Rangers win 4-2.

Some Thoughts:

-Any talk about how Texas’ hitters are 0-19 against Giants closer Brian Wilson (I’m looking your way Buster Olney) seems foolish to me. That is not an x-factor statistic. No one is expecting Brian Wilson to be the x-factor here. He’s not going to blow saves like he’s Byung Hyun-Kim here. He’s an elite closer, so it’s no surprise the Rangers have struggled to hit him. If the Giants can get it to B-dub, with the lead, I expect them to win. However, there are 8 innings with which they’ll have to find a way to take a lead in to get the ball to their closer.

-I expect Buster Posey to slump horribly in this series. But for one solid game against the Phillies, Posey has been disappointing thus far in his first playoff adventure. Yes, he’s a rookie with a lot of weight on his shoulders, but that’s no reason to just say, “Oh, well it’s not his fault.” It is. He’s in the #4 hole for a reason, people. The pressure is there. The Giants need a good series from Posey to beat the Rangers.

-Vlad Guerrero playing in RF isn’t really that big of a deal. We (and by “we” I mean the media, of which I am not a member) make a big deal about DHs having to play in the field in the World Series. Tell me the last time it’s truly affected the outcome of a game.

-The Giants have the bullpen edge. Big time.

-The Rangers have the offensive edge. Big time.

-The teams are closer in starting pitching than you’d think.

-Series MVP: Elvis Andrus.

-Oh, and Cliff Lee will sign with the Yankees for $140 million over 7 years.

Enjoy this World Series. I heard it said this week, don’t worry about the ratings. If you’re a baseball fan, this is a dream scenario. Ratings mean nothing to you. And it’s true. The crowds in San Francisco and Arlington will be electric. This will be a fun series, even if the Rangers sweep. Two teams that are easy to root for, with a lot of really good guys. This will be a nice end to a very good MLB season.

America and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad NFC

Quick. Find 21 friends. Okay, that’s not that easy for most people. So just find 21 people. Now, assign each of them and yourself a football position. Done? Good, now you’re a contender for the 2010 NFC championship.


Heading into tonight’s Cowboys/Giants game, here’s the breakdown of the records for the 16 NFC teams:

5-2: 1 Team
4-2: 3 Teams
4-3: 5 Teams
3-3: 1 Team
3-4: 1 Team
2-4: 1 Team
1-4: 1 Team
1-5: 2 Teams
1-6: 1 Team

That would be 10 of the 16 teams within 2 games of first place Atlanta in the NFC. And the thing is, trying to pick a favorite is seemingly impossible. Almost everyone has something that could make them a favorite and at the same time, has a glaring issue that makes them very vulnerable. Let’s look at each of the contending teams (sorry San Francisco, Carolina, and Detroit) and the reason why they can win, and the reason why they shouldn’t win the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad NFC.

Atlanta (5-2)
They Can Win Because….They’ve got a weapon at every offensive position, are well coached, and play really well at home.
They Shouldn’t Win Because….They’re a different team away from the Georgia Dome. 3-0 at home. 2-2 on the road (the wins are against Cleveland and New Orleans). Also, they’re pass defense ranks 28th in the NFL and when you have the home field advantage of playing in a dome, teams are going to throw on you. Like Cincinnati did yesterday. For 385 yards.

New York Giants (4-2)
They Can Win Because….They’re very good on defense. 2nd against the pass. 7th against the run. And they’re a veteran bunch, led by a veteran coach.
They Shouldn’t Win Because…Eli Manning seems willing to throw an INT for every TD he throws this season. And if you look at their schedule, the best team they’ve played thus far is either Indianapolis or Tennessee. They were blown out in both of those games. But they did just beat the Lions by 8. At home.

Seattle Seahawks (4-2)
They Can Win Because….They play in an atrocious division and have a very good defense (third fewest points allowed in the NFL). And unlike Atlanta, they have a real home field advantage.
They Shouldn’t Win Because…Pete Carroll is their head coach. I’ve chided this team from the start and I’m perplexed by their 4-2 start. Their leading receiver weighed 260 LBS and was out of football last year. And Matt Hasselbeck has been shaky, at best. Do you trust him to lead your team to the promised land?

Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-2)
They Can Win Because….They’re young, hungry, and they’ve learned how to win the games that they should, like yesterday’s against the Rams.
They Shouldn’t Win Because…They’re coached by Raheem Morris, have an awful rush defense, and an awful running game. Oh, and that youth thing? Also can be a disadvantage.

Chicago Bears (4-3)
They Can Win Because…Their defense is very good, when they show up and play hard for 60 minutes.
They Shouldn’t Win Because….Let’s see, they turn the ball over like it’s a hobby, they have no offensive balance, Matt Forte is wasting away in Mike Martz’s outdated offense, Jay Cutler is going to get killed with these preposterous 7 step drops, oh, and their defense isn’t good enough to carry them, because they have lapses where they allow people like Ryan Torain to rush for 120+ yards on them.

Green Bay Packers (4-3)
They Can Win Because…They can throw the ball down your throat.
They Shouldn’t Win Because….They’re just too injured. Everywhere. It started with Ryan Grant in week 1. They’re without Nick Barnett and Atari Bigby on the defensive side. Charles Woodson isn’t playing like he did last year. Clay Matthews Jr. is playing hurt. And the biggest loss of all, Jermichael Finley, their stud TE, is done for the season. It’s a lot to ask of Aaron Rodgers.

New Orleans Saints (4-3)
They Can Win Because…They did last year. And Reggie Bush will be back soon.
They Shouldn’t Win Because…They did last year. And they haven’t put that past them. They can say all they want to that last year’s Super Bowl is old news, but when you lose at home, like they did yesterday, to the Cleveland Browns (who are being led by a 3rd string rookie QB, no less) there’s got to be a pretty heavy hangover.

Washington Redskins (4-3)
They Can Win Because….They’re winning the close ones. They’ve only been involved in one game with a result of more than one TD (a questionable loss to the Rams.)
They Shouldn’t Win Because…Their defense. Is. Awful. Second to last against the pass and 21st of 32 against the run. They don’t do anything well. So far, they’ve done enough to get by. They’ve bent, but not broken. Who’s to say they won’t crumble?

Philadelphia Eagles (4-3)
They Can Win Because…They’re so balanced offensively (Top 10 in both passing and rushing) and Michael Vick is on his way back.
They Shouldn’t Win Because….Of games like yesterday’s. There’s no way that the Eagles should get blown out by the Titans. But they did. They have this electricity that makes them elite, but that only comes out once every 3 or 4 weeks. You can’t do that and hope to win a trip to the Super Bowl.

Arizona Cardinals (3-3)
They Can Win Because…They’re really good at home and play in a really bad division. And that formula has worked before.
They Shouldn’t Win Because…Good heavens, are they awful. Easily the worst 3-3 team I’ve ever seen. Offensively, they rank 32nd in passing (dead last) and 29th in rushing. Defensively, they’re 21st against the pass and 29th against the rush. They do nothing well and are led by an undrafted, 25 year old, rookie quarterback, who is 5’11” and hasn’t thrown a TD in 4 games played. Good enough for you?

St. Louis Rams (3-4)
They Can Win Because…They’re like the Buccaneers. Young and hungry.
They Shouldn’t Win Because…They’re led by a rookie QB. I can’t name more than 10 players on their active roster and I follow sports like my life depends on it. And, most importantly, they haven’t quite learned how to win the games that they should win, like yesterday’s against Tampa Bay. But they could easily be 4-4 heading into their bye week, with a game against Carolina this Sunday.

Minnesota Vikings (2-4)
They Can Win Because…They’re the best team in the NFC. They just haven’t realized it yet.
They Shouldn’t Win Because…It’s getting close to being too late to realize it. They’re led by the NFL’s all-time leader in every major passing statistic, the best running back in the game, the NFC’s best offensive line, a future Hall-of-Fame receiver, the most electric skill player in the conference, and a veteran defense. And yet they’re 2-4. And I think the record is the only thing standing in their way. And themselves.

Dallas Cowboys (1-4)
They Can Win Because….They’re the second best team in the NFC. And they actually know it.
They Shouldn’t Win Because…They’re so poorly coached. How it is that such a good football team is close to being 1-5 is beyond me. Every loss has been a close one because they’ve beaten themselves. They’re 3rd in passing and no NFL team has allowed fewer yards on defense. If you eliminated one bone-headed play per game, this entire post would be irrelevant because they’d be 5-0. Instead, they’re close to becoming irrelevant.

So who’s got it? Well, a few weeks ago, I picked the Giants. I also think Michael Vick changes the Eagles. He makes them electric every week, potentially. And Minnesota was within a few inches on a Brett Favre pass from being a game back in the North. And a win tonight could really put the Cowboys on track. And there’s always the Falcons. They’re a boring bunch. Nothing sexy there, but in such a weird season, maybe, for once, sexy isn’t en vogue. Last year, it was the Saints and their great story line. They had hero QB Drew Brees and a reenergized city. They were sexy. But now, maybe perfectly mediocre is good enough to get the job done in 2010. And if so, why not the Falcons? Or the Seahawks? Or the Bears? Right now, the NFC is a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad conference. But I have a feeling, come mid-December, we’re going to be in for some pretty great, fun, and thrilling football, as all of these teams scramble for that one playoff berth that could lead them to the promised land.

Until they get thrashed by the Jets in the Super Bowl.

A Story About A Man Named Cliff

Last week, in my ALCS preview, I mentioned that I think Cliff Lee might be a
better pitcher than Randy Johnson and the best since Sandy Koufax. Before
we get into that discussion though, let’s take a look back at how Cliff Lee
got here.
Lee was a 4th round draft pick by the Montreal Expos in 2000 out of the
University of Arkansas. He was traded by the Expos (along with Brandon
Phillips and Grady Sizemore) in what may be the worst trade in the history
of professional sports to the Cleveland Indians for Bartolo Colon in 2002.
In his debut for the Indians that year, he threw 5.1 innings, striking out 4
and walking four. It would be the beginning of what looked like would be a
mediocre, back of the rotation career.
From his debut until the end of the 2007 season, Lee was nothing if not
average. His W-L record was good, but his numbers weren’t spectacular. He
showed signs of brilliance during his 2004 season, when he finished fourth
in AL Cy Young voting with an 18-5 record and a 3.79 ERA. But he walked 52
batters that season, for a pedestrian 2.75 K/BB ratio.
Lee would go on to drop off from there, landing himself back in the minors
in 2007 after a disastrous stretch that had him fighting with teammates and
provoking Indians fans who were unhappy with his performance. He finished
2007 with the following statistical line:
5-8, 6.29 ERA, 72 ERA+, 1.6 HR/9, 1.83 K/BB ratio, etc, etc.
He was a disaster. He had become a progressively worse pitcher over time
and was a 28 year old minor leaguer in 2007. Then something happened.
In 2008, Lee won the Cy Young award, easily. Compare the above line in 2007
to this one:
22-3, 2.54 ERA, 168 ERA+, 0.5 HR/9, 5.00 K/BB ratio, etc. etc.
Since then, Cliff Lee has been the best pitcher in baseball. This year, he
struck out 185 batters and walked 18 (10.28 K/BB ratio), for example.
As good as Lee has been over the past 3 seasons, he has been that much
better in the postseason. His combined numbers:
6-0, 1.44 ERA, 6 BB, 54 K, 1 HR allowed in having faced 211 batters.
So here we are. Lee has only been an elite pitcher for 3 years, and at the
age of 32, probably doesn’t have 10 more years of pitching in him. So it’s
hard to compare against the careers of guys like Randy Johnson and Steve
Carlton. Looking at the numbers that Johnson put up from 1999-2002 alone, I realize
that I’m an idiot for even thinking about comparing Johnson to Lee. They’re
not even close. Johnson was at the top of his career during that stretch,
won 17 games or more each year, never had an ERA above 2.64, and struck out
at least 334 batters in each of those four seasons. If a 10+ strikeout game
is considered an elite benchmark for a pitcher, consider if you would that
Johnson struck out 10+ batters 23 times in 2001 alone.
The comparison becomes slightly more fair when we look at postseason
pitching performances. Johnson, in his postseason career:
7-9, 3.50 ERA, 32 BB, 132 K, 15 HR allowed in having faced 493 batters.
Lee has him beat across the board, except for strikeouts, which were
Johnson’s specialty. And even then, Lee is only averaging one fewer
strikeout over 9 innings in his postseason career than Johnson did.
So perhaps I should have qualified my statement as being postseason
relative. For that, let’s look at another great lefty pitcher of this era,
Steve Carlton, and his postseason success:
6-6, 3.26 ERA, 51 BB, 84 K, 7 HR allowed in having faced 429 batter.
Again, more experience than Lee, but Lee’s numbers are better across the
board.
Now, Sandy Koufax, widely regarded as the best left-handed, postseason
pitcher of this era. His career playoff numbers:
4-3, 0.95 ERA, 11 BB, 61 K, 2 HR allowed in having faced 213 batters.
Lee: 56.1 IP, 6-0, 1.44 ERA, 6 BB, 54 K, 1 HR allowed in having faced 211
batters.
Koufax: 57.0 IP, 4-3, 0.95 ERA, 11 BB, 61 K, 2 HR allowed in having faced
213 batters.
Remarkably similar, no?
So, what’s the point? Well, it’s pretty simple. While Cliff Lee hasn’t
quite built up the regular season resume to make it even worth comparing him
to the best left-handed pitchers of this era in baseball, he has
more than built up the postseason resume to do so. Ignore Koufax’s W-L
record (which, again, is meaningless, because he did everything he could to
help the Dodgers and got no run support (in his three postseason losses, he
was given a total of 1 run to work with.)). When you do, you have
nearly the same pitcher. The other great lefties of this era (Johnson and
Carlton, namely) don’t have the postseason resumes to belong in the
conversation with Lee and Koufax. They are the two best postseason
left-handed pitchers in the modern era of baseball.
Back to Lee, exclusively; There will always be a stigma with him. There
will always be those who don’t want to give him the credit he has proven
that he deserves. Much as people did with Jose Bautista of the Blue Jays
this season, people will continue to think back to 2007 Cliff Lee and refuse
to believe that he’s put that period of his career fully behind him.
They’ll wait and anticipate the collapse. But Cliff Lee of 2010 is not
Cliff Lee of 2007. He’s a smarter pitcher. He’s a more effective pitcher.
He’s a more mature pitcher.
Tonight, Cliff Lee will start his second postseason game at Yankee
Stadium. In his previous start, he threw a complete game, ten strikeout,
gem of a performance against the Yankees. It was the most dominant
postseason performance in my lifetime, and it was done on the biggest stage,
in the World Series, against the most successful franchise in sports
history, in their home park.
Tonight, if Lee pitches like that again, he will own sole claim as the
greatest left-handed pitcher in modern postseason history.

Championship Series Preview

(Editor’s Note: I wrote this in a frenzy to get it up before Game 1 between Texas and New York tonight. I will edit this later. Please disregard my typing errors for now.)

The gods of baseball were very kind to us. We could have been staring down a two week relationship with the Cincinnati Reds and Atlanta Braves in the NL and the Minnesota Twins and Tampa Bay Rays in the AL. Think about those ratings. I vividly remember reading, back in 1998, the notion that ABC executives would be flinging themselves off of headquarters if they were left with Kansas State in the national championship game that year. Thankfully for them, Texas A&M upset the Wildcats in the Big XII title game and instead, ABC executives were treated to Peyton Manning and the Tennessee Volunteers, beating Bobby Bowden’s Florida State Seminoles. I was upset though. I really enjoyed that year’s Kansas State team. As I’ve grown older though, I’ve learned to appreciate marquee matchups, even if I don’t have a true rooting interest. Because I can always develop one if it’s not already there. Because there’s something special about the marquee. And that’s what we’re getting this year in baseball. Not Kansas State and Tennessee. We’re getting the best pitchers in the game, historic blue-bloods, and easy-to-love up and comers from a major media market. So, rejoice Fox and TBS executives. The gods were kind to you, like they were to ABC in 1998.

ALCS: New York Yankees v. Texas Rangers
Breakdown- The Rangers are the aforementioned “up-and-comer” and I love watching them. Their weakness lies in their pitching depth. Cliff Lee is as good as it gets in baseball and perhaps as good as it has been, for a left-handed pitcher, since Sandy Koufax. And that includes Randy Johnson (I expect a post about this sometime next week, but feel free to call me insane for that comment now.). After Lee comes Game 1 starter CJ Wilson, a free-thinking, straight edge, finesse pitcher who considers himself the poor man’s Cliff Lee. And it works. To have two solid lefty starters, in their prime, is an asset. For Texas though, the question after Lee and Wilson, is who’s next? Tommy Hunter’s numbers might look good to the old-timers (13-4 regular season) but for those of us who can understand tangible stats, Hunter is just an average, back-of-the-rotation guy. And Colby Lewis is more of the same. Perhaps the poor man’s version of Tommy Hunter. Two starters, in a seven game series, is not enough. You need the third guy.
The Yankees may have the third guy in Phillip Hughes, and even though he struggled mightily in the regular season, AJ Burnett certainly has the potential to be that third guy.
The Yankees offense is as good as Texas’ and vice versa. The X-factor is Neftali Feliz, Texas’ closer. He was lights out during the regular season, but someone forgot to tell him to turn off the lights in the ALDS. He was awful. Couldn’t find the strike zone and when he did, he couldn’t place his pitches.
Ultimately, I think Texas’ run will come to an end. I’ll be rooting for them, but the Yankees experience and their experienced closer, Mariano Rivera, will get the job done. Yankees win in 6.
NLCS: San Francisco Giants v. Philadelphia Phillies
Breakdown- This marquee matchup has all the makings of a classic. The Giants were the only team who could hit the Phillies Big 3 in the regular season and the Phillies struggled with the Giants rotation. However, Philadelphia comes in hotter than anyone. They eviscerated the Cincinnati Reds in 3 games, no-hitting them in one game. Philly didn’t exactly tear the cover off the ball though against the Reds mediocre pitching, which has a lot of people concerned.
The key matchup in this series is not tomorrow night’s showdown between Roy Halladay and Tim Lincecum. It is instead Sunday’s showdown between Jonathan Sanchez and Roy Oswalt and Tuesday’s between Matt Cain and Cole Hamels. I like the Phillies in the latter two games. So whether they go into game 4 up 2-1, or down 3-0 won’t matter to me. This is a team, Philadelphia, that knows how to step on an opponents throat. They know how to win a postseason series. And they’re peaking at the right time. For me, this is disappointing because I don’t need a reason to root for the Giants. If you are a long-time reader, you know I root for the Giants at almost any time. I just think Philly is too good right now for the Giants and their lackluster offense to contend with. Philadelphia wins in 5.

NFL Power Rankings: Version The First One

Sadly, no commentary from me on the state of Brett Favre’s cell phone camera. Before I take inventory of the NFL through a power rankings type list, let’s take a quick look at the Major League Baseball playoffs. Not to toot my own horn (I’M AWESOME!!!!) but I’ve hit each series nearly dead on so far, as we head into Game 5 between Texas and Tampa Bay tonight at the Trop. I expect the Rangers to win this game thanks to another masterful playoff performance by Cliff Lee. David Price did not look good in Game 1. His pitch selection was awful (he threw 21 consecutive fastballs to start the game) and he got hit hard by everyone in Texas’ lineup. If I’m Texas, I’m nervous about this becoming a bullpen game because Neftali Feliz probably shouldn’t pitch in this game, considering how bad he’s looked in his first playoff go-round. My prediction: 5-1 win for Texas. Lee pitches 8 innings, striking out 8 and walking none. Someone (Darren O’Day perhaps) closes out the ninth for the Rangers, who move on to a seven game series with the Yankees, that likely won’t go seven games.

We’re heading into a separation Sunday sort of day for the NFL. A handful of teams will have their season made or broken this week. Here are the five most important matchups:

Baltimore @ New England- A huge test for both teams. New England needs to show some defensive growth. Baltimore needs to shred the Patriots’ young D.

Dallas @ Minnesota- The loser is done for the 2010 season, as they will fall to 1-4.

Philadelphia @ Atlanta- Are the Falcons for real? Can Kevin Kolb keep the Eagles afloat? And how awesome would it have been to have had Michael Vick starting this game?

Miami @ Green Bay- The Dolphins need a win against a good team to prove their worth. And Green Bay needs to show some life.

Indianapolis @ Washington- The Redskins can create a believer or two with a win over the Colts in front of a national audience.

I’ve never been a big fan of the power rankings you see published by national media outlets, where all 32 teams are measured against each other. So here are our divisional power rankings, after 5 weeks of the NFL season:

AFC East

1. New York Jets
2. New England Patriots
3. Miami Dolphins
4. Buffalo Bills

– The Jets have beaten the Patriots and the Dolphins, which lands them the top spot. For most people’s money, their biggest weakness is Quarterback. Mark Sanchez has a passer rtg. of 91.7 (higher than Aaron Rodgers) and is the only starting QB in the NFL without an interception thrown. He might not look like an elite quarterback all the time, but Sanchez is effective enough. As for the Patriots and Dolphins, I think they’re very close, but I give the Patriots the advantage because they beat Miami on the road. Buffalo will have the first pick in the draft and might go 0-16. Their only shot at a win comes in mid-November when Detroit comes to Buffalo.

AFC North

1. Pittsburgh Steelers
2. Baltimore Ravens
3. Cleveland Browns
4. Cincinnati Bengals

– Yes, Cincinnati beat Baltimore in Week 2, but that looks like the high point for the 2010 Bengals. Meanwhile, the Ravens have gotten better each week and have to be feeling great after Ray Rice had his best game of 2010. The Ravens are like the Jets, in that their perceived weakness is at the QB position. Joe Flacco though, unlike Mark Sanchez, has been awful thus far, which keeps the Ravens behind the Steelers. And while Baltimore beat Pittsburgh at Heinz Field in Week 4, the Steelers were without Ben Roethlisberger, who comes back this week. The Steelers defense has been outstanding so far and I don’t see that stopping. I like Cleveland more than Cincinnati because the Bengals look like a team that is on the verge of quitting on their coach, while the Browns fight hard every week.

AFC South

1. Indianapolis Colts
2. Tennessee Titans
3. Houston Texans
4. Jacksonville Jaguars

-I know that the Colts have already lost to both Houston and Jacksonville, but I would remind you that they’re still tied for first in this underratedly bad division. And who do you want quarterbacking your average team? Peyton Manning or David Garrard? I rest my case.

AFC West

1. San Diego Chargers
2. Kansas City Chiefs
3. Denver Broncos
4. Oakland Raiders

– Call me a non-believer in the Chiefs. Matt Cassel is not the quarterback of the future or the present for this team. His unsteady leadership is what is holding back Jamaal Charles from breaking out. Dexter McCluster should be touching the ball 20 times a game, but isn’t. And Dwayne Bowe has been more than awful at receiver. And it all goes back to Cassel’s play. The Chiefs don’t have a consistent enough passing game and that’s hurting everything else on offense. The Chargers, meanwhile, can score on anyone, but can’t stop anyone. Denver runs the ball like an Arena League team. And Oakland is hinging all of its hopes on Bruce Gradkowski staying healthy. This division is the NFL’s version of Jersey Shore. It’s painful to look at, but it sure is fun. For some people. Not me. I like real football. I’ll tip my cap towards the Chargers because they do what they do well the best of anyone here.

NFC East

1. New York Giants
2. Philadelphia Eagles
3. Washington Redskins
4. Dallas Cowboys

-Michael Vick’s health would push the Eagles to my number one spot, but in his absence, we’re going with the Giants and their improved defense and improving running game. Eli Manning, though, needs to be a lot more careful with the football. The Eagles just need Kevin Kolb to manage games until Vick returns. The defense isn’t good, but it’s good enough in the East. Washington is an enigma to me and not worth talking about. And Dallas just isn’t worth talking about.

NFC North

1. Minnesota Vikings
2. Chicago Bears
3. Green Bay Packers
4. Detroit Lions

-The Vikings are either going to be a hot rod that will race to the top of this division or the wheels will fall off. I don’t know why, but I’m leaning towards them coming from behind to win the race. They’ve only played one division game and they won it. They can do some damage. Chicago is playing well, but Mike Martz’s genius offense isn’t so smart in Chicago in November and December. They will collapse. And I don’t know what’s wrong with Green Bay, other than them clearly buying into the hype. Much like the Saints. Speaking of which….

NFC South

1. Atlanta Falcons
2. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
3. New Orleans Saints
4. Carolina Panthers

– The Falcons showed that they can beat New Orleans in Week 3. And I know they’re better than Tampa Bay. They should be able to win this division rather easily. They’re good everywhere, but not great. They’re solid, not sexy. I don’t see a Super Bowl run in them, but they’re a functional playoff team. You may be shocked by Tampa over New Orleans, but you’ll see this Sunday when these two teams play in Tampa that the Bucs are for real. Josh Freeman has progressed hugely in his second season and the young defense has done a good job so far in 2010. I know that Pittsburgh manhandled them in Week 3. But Pittsburgh is a lot better than every team in the South, including the Saints. I wasn’t high on New Orleans coming into the season and I’m still not sold on them. Drew Brees has been nothing short of mediocre thus far. The injury to Reggie Bush has hurt an already weak running game. And Devery Henderson and Robert Meachem have regressed this season. The offense is nowhere near as good as it was in 2010. And the defense was never that good to begin with. (See: Giving up 30 points to Max Hall and the Arizona Cardinals. And they should have lost to San Francisco too.)

NFC West

1. St. Louis Rams
2. Arizona Cardinals
3. Seattle Seahawks
4. San Francisco 49ers

-Here we have the worst team winning a division and the best team finishing in last. This describes the NFC very well. While Dallas, Minnesota, San Francisco, New Orleans, and Green Bay are all struggling to stay relevant, the St. Louis Rams (led by a rookie quarterback), the Arizona Cardinals (led by an undrafted rookie quarterback), and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers (led by a second year quarterback) are all playing above their heads. I like the energy in St. Louis. They’re by no means a good football team, but neither are the Cardinals, Seahawks, or Niners. Sam Bradford has shown flashes of greatness. As for Arizona, I have a very hard time buying into Max Hall as an NFL QB. And I still think Seattle is awful, but if their defense can continue playing well, led by NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year favorite Earl Thomas, I might have to eat my crow. And for those who think San Francisco is still going to win this division, you clearly haven’t watched this team play.

At the start of the year, I predicted Green Bay and Baltimore would play in the Super Bowl. I’m changing my mind on both teams. Baltimore hasn’t gotten the QB play it needs and Ray Rice has been inconsistent. I like the Jets to win the AFC. I think Mark Sanchez can manage a game well enough to let the defense win almost every week. In the NFC, I cannot see Green Bay putting it together without any running game. Aaron Rodgers needs something. I’m not too concerned with his absence for a week or two with a concussion nearly as much as I am with the fact that when he returns, the team will likely be .500 and facing a Minnesota team that won’t have to plan for the run. In the NFC, you can a feather into a hurricane and see where it lands. For right now, I like the Giants or Eagles. I’ll be cute and take the Giants so that we have an all-New York Super Bowl, played in Dallas.

Early Season Awards:

NFL MVP: Michael Vick. The Eagles with Vick looked like an unstoppable force. If he returns soon and stays healthy, he’ll win this award. Peyton Manning also deserves so pub, except his team is 3-2 and 0-2 in the division. I’d put Phillip Rivers third on this list for now, with Tom Brady a distant 4th.

NFL Def. POY: Troy Polamalu. Not even close.

NFL Off. ROY: Jahvid Best. He gets the nod over Sam Bradford.

NFL Def. ROY: Earl Thomas. Game changing safety. Much better than I thought he’d be.

NFL Coach of the Year: Raheem Morris. Has turned Tampa from a joke to a tough, young football team. They’re the NFL’s Oklahoma City Thunder from two years ago.

2010 MLB Divisional Series Preview

(editor’s note: This was written on Monday October 4th)

As I write this, I’m watching the minor train wreck that is the New York Mets hold a press conference discussing the team’s future. Earlier today, they fired GM Omar Minaya and Manager Jerry Manuel, about two years too late. Minaya was an abhorrent failure in New York as GM. The Mets minor league system is in the bottom 1/3 of MLB and the Major League club isn’t exactly awash in great talent, outside of David Wright, Johan Santana, and amateur boxer Francisco Rodriguez. The Mets developed the nickname “The Mess” this year. And that shouldn’t change in 2011.

Also today, the Pittsburgh Pirates fired manager John Russell. I know nothing about John Russell, but here’s what I do know: Russell was given the “opportunity” to manage an overmatched group of top prospects (Pedro Alvarez), good young players (Andrew McCutchen), failed prospects (Lastings Milledge), and replacement players (Delwyn Young). And that was the good part. The bad part was the Pirates pitching. Zach Duke, Charlie Morton, Jeff Karstens, and Brian Burres all saw a little too much of the pitching mound. The lone bright spot from a pitching standpoint, to me, was James McDonald, who came over from the Dodgers and showed some promise for the future. Sadly, for James and the Pirates and their great fans, he’ll likely be the Opening Day starter in 2011.

But we’re not hear to talk about 2011, are we? We’re here to look ahead to what should be a great postseason.

The American League gives us two interesting matchups. First, we’ve seen Minnesota play the New York Yankees quite a bit in the playoffs. In fact, they’ve met 4 times in the ALDS in the last ten years. But there’s something different about this matchup. First, the Twins have home field advantage. Second, the Yankees pitching is not very good. Third, the Twins have that really pretty new park, Target Field. You know what’s not different? The fact that the Yankees will win this series. Just like they have every other time they’ve played. The difference maker? Clearly the offense. The absence of Justin Morneau from Minnesota’s lineup will hurt them in a way that it didn’t during the regular season. The Yankees took 5 of 7 from the Twins during the regular season. If Minnesota can’t get to CC Sabathia in Game 1, the playoffs won’t be any different. The Yankees doubters will cite the fact that if the season started on August 1, New York would have finished last in the AL East. Those of us who aren’t trying to be contradictory will cite that these are the New York Yankees. Yankees win 3-1.

The other ALDS matchup is far more interesting, because we haven’t seen this one before. In my July “look-ahead” post, I talked about how much I was looking forward to this then potential matchup. “ I’m giddy at the possibility of this series,” I said. Well, I’m still giddy, especially for the first game which gives us the marquee pitching matchup of the DS games: Cliff Lee v. David Price. I expect the Rays to win Game 1. Game 2 is where it gets very interesting, with CJ Wilson facing James Shields and anything can happen from there. Back in July, I said that the Rays would win a very close 3-2 series. I’m going to flip-flop here and give this one to the Rangers, also 3-2. Tampa has struggled in Arlington, Texas over the past two season. If the Rays don’t win the first two at home, they won’t win the series. Rangers win 3-2.

In the National League, our first matchup pits the Phillies and Reds. This series will not be close. The Phillies pitching is way too good for Cincinnati to try to contend with and the Phillies offense is more stacked than the Reds. Philadelphia wins 3-0 in one of those series that is over before your realized it started.

On the other side, we have the Giants and Braves. The thing that jumps out at my first is that we’ll get to see Jason Heyward and Buster Posey square off on the biggest stage of their young, promising careers. I expect both to struggle a bit. I like the Giants in this series because they’re better stocked than Atlanta, who will have to win with an inferior pitching rotation and without Chipper Jones and, more importantly in this, the year 2010, Martin Prado. As always, this comes down to the ability of the road team (Atlanta) to steal a game on the road in the first two. I don’t think the Braves can do that, based on pitching matchups (Lincecum/Cain vs. Lowe/Hanson). Atlanta can take a game at home, but it ultimately won’t make a difference. Don’t expect a lot of runs (think a few 3-1 games). Do expect a Giants win 3-1.

Before I go, I’d like to weigh in on the MLB Regular Season awards.

AL MVP: Josh Hamilton (His numbers, even without the month of September, are the reason why this team is where it is right now.)
AL Cy Young: Felix Hernandez (It’s not even close. I don’t care about pitcher wins. It’s not 1978 anymore. Let’s take a look at the stats to the right of that pesky “W.” If we do, Hernandez blew away CC Sabathia and David Price).
AL Rookie of the Year: Neftali Feliz (I’d prefer Brian Matusz if this award was given away for performance in August and September, while ignoring May, June, and July. It isn’t, so Feliz’s solid year closing for Texas wins a cheapy).
AL Manager of the Year: Terry Francona (Maybe I’m biased, but he trotted out a AAA lineup every day and nearly snuck into the playoffs. Sorry Ron Washington.)

NL MVP: Joey Votto (I give it to Votto for his consistent year, leading a division winner, with great production).
NL Cy Young: Roy Halladay (Adam Wainwright is closer than most are giving him credit for).
NL Rookie of the Year: Jason Heyward (This is the most compelling of the awards. Posey and Heyward put up very similar numbers. Heyward’s WAR is 1.5 better than Posey’s and he played from Day 1, and so I lean him. But Posey is just as deserving. I tend to think they should split the award).
NL Manager of the Year: Bud Black (No contest).