Quarterback Madness 2011

You may remember (and I pity you if you do) that last year I penned a piece pitting all of the NFL’s quarterbacks against each other in a battle of “who would you build your franchise around?” It’s not so much a question of “Who’s the best now?” And that’s important when you’re measuring rookies against established veterans.

Well, I want to do this again, but with some fixes. Instead of going with each teams’ current starting QB, I’m going to go with the one that each team views as their best QB. In the case of the Colts, that’s Peyton Manning. In the case of the Vikings, that’s Christian Ponder. For the Titans, I think it’s Matt Hasselbeck. The reason why it’s not Jake Locker is because there’s no chance he’s going to start a game this year. For the Vikings, what about Donovan McNabb has led you to believe that Christian Ponder, a four year college starter and Top 15 pick, isn’t going to get some starts? And if you disagree with this, I encourage you to tell me so.
The other change is that each QB will be seeded by his team’s current offensive scoring output. It’ll be like March Madness, just with 32 teams instead of 68. And I’ll make fun of people.
Each “region” will be named for aN NFL QB great. There’s no correlation between the name of the region and the players you see. In the semi-finals, the winners of the Otto Graham Region will play the winners of the Fran Tarkenton Region. Steve Young plays Warren Moon.
FIRST ROUND
OTTO GRAHAM REGION
1.) Ryan Fitzpatrick (Buffalo Bills)
8.) Matt Cassel (Kansas City Chiefs)
They’re the same age (Cassel is a few months older). Neither has won a playoff game. Neither has a shining resume. I take Fitzpatrick because it appears as though he’s trending upward, while Cassel simply exists. I think Cassel’s ceiling has been hit. Fitzpatrick could be the poor man’s Drew Brees, which isn’t bad at all.
4.) Tony Romo (Dallas Cowboys)
5.) Jay Cutler (Chicago Bears)
Earlier this season, after the Jets collapse, all we heard about was how Tony Romo wasn’t clutch. Romo quieted those people by playing through the pain of a fractured rib and a punctured lung, leading the Cowboys to their 2-1 record. Meanwhile, Jay Cutler, in the biggest game of his life, sat on the sidelines because his knee hurt.
3.) Mark Sanchez (New York Jets)
6.) Matt Hasselbeck (Tennessee Titans)
Sanchez. Mark’s ceiling might be Matt Hasselbeck, but he’s still 11 years younger.
2.) Aaron Rodgers (Green Bay Packers)
7.) Peyton Manning (Indianapolis Colts)
If you want to talk about “not even close…” Look Aaron Rodgers is going to win this thing. You know it and I know it. Peyton might never play again and he’s only here because the Colts never thought it was important to build for their future.
STEVE YOUNG REGION
1.) Tom Brady (New England Patriots)
8.) Blaine Gabbert (Jacksonville Jaguars)
Gabbert’s youth is enticing. His “not really good” is less enticing.
4.) Rex Grossman (Washington Redskins)
5.) Cameron Newton (Carolina Panthers)
Part of what led Newton to two 400 yard passing games to start his career was that he threw the ball a ton. And he wasn’t necessarily pretty. This week he managed a game and led the Panthers to victory. If Newton can find a balance between the two, he has every tool to win this thing in a few years. For now, he’s certainly good enough to beat Rex Grossman.
3.) Michael Vick (Philadelphia Eagles)
6.) Kyle Orton (Denver Broncos)
Vick is the most dynamic QB in football. And even though he’s shown to be a little brittle, Kyle Orton woke up today and he was still Kyle Orton.
2.) Jason Campbell (Oakland Raiders)
7.) Chad Henne (Miami Dolphins)
That either of these guys gets to the Round of 16 is unfortunate for nearly every QB who will lose in Round 1. Campbell by a hair.
WARREN MOON REGION
1.) Drew Brees (New Orleans Saints)
8.) Tavaris Jackson (Seattle Seahawks)
There is no greater disparity in this bracket.
4.) Phillip Rivers (San Diego Chargers)
5.) Matt Ryan (Atlanta Falcons)
When it worked out that these two faced each other, I was very intrigued. Then I remembered that Matt Ryan has yet to take the next turn in his career. And Rivers is still only 29.
3.) Eli Manning (New York Giants)
6.) Kevin Kolb (Arizona Cardinals)
With Manning, you know what you’re getting. I think Kolb can be a serviceable NFL starter. Manning already is a serviceable QB. I continue to believe that if Eli’s last name was Smith, he wouldn’t be as highly regarded as he is. Against Kolb, it wouldn’t really matter what his last name was.
2.) Matt Schaub (Houston Texans)
7.) Ben Roethlisberger (Pittsburgh Steelers)

Do you take the boring, accurate, prototypical QB who hasn’t been to the playoffs or the big, oafish, twice-accused of sexual assault, two-time Super Bowl winning QB? That’s not really as hard as I thought.
FRAN TARKENTON REGION
1.) Matthew Stafford (Detroit Lions)
8.) Sam Bradford (Saint Louis Rams)
Bradford’s development seems slightly retarded (I just wanted to type that word in an unoffensive context that would make readers do a double take) this season. Meanwhile, Stafford is the early season MVP favorite in my book. And still only 23 years old.
4.) Colt McCoy (Cleveland Browns)
5.) Josh Freeman (Tampa Bay Buccaneers)
Against most of the other competition here, I’d take either McCoy or Freeman. Against each other, I take the flashier guy. The one who has shown an almost strange ability to make things happen in the clutch. That’s Freeman.
3.) Alex Smith (San Francisco 49ers)
6.) Christian Ponder (Minnesota Vikings)
I’ll take the guy who hasn’t taken an NFL snap over Alex Smith.
2.) Joe Flacco (Baltimore Ravens)
7.) Andy Dalton (Cincinnati Bengals)
I’m still not certain that we’ve seen Flacco’s ceiling, whereas with Ryan, I think we may have. Flacco appears to be capable of great passing performances (Weeks 1 and 3 for example) but he’s also capable of playing like Andy Dalton (Week 2 for example). Still, Andy Dalton is Andy Dalton. He’s an accurate QB with little flash who likely won’t be the starter in Cincinnati in 5 years.
THE SWEET (AND IN SOME SPOTS, TERRIBLE) 16
OTTO GRAHAM REGION
1.) Ryan Fitzpatrick
4.) Tony Romo
Look, I love the idea of a Harvard QB just as much as the next guy, but Romo is still the better play. Even if he isn’t “clutch.” Can you tell I hate that narrative? I really hate that narrative.
3.) Mark Sanchez
2.) Aaron Rodgers
Mark Sanchez, I’m sure, is a very nice young man. He’s incredibly handsome and he’s a decent QB. Top 15, maybe. Aaron Rodgers is in a class that Mark Sanchez will never reach.
STEVE YOUNG REGION
1.) Tom Brady
5.) Cameron Newton
This gets a little murky now. I think Tom Brady probably has another 2-3 years after this of top level QB play. But he’s also in a situation where he has two capable, young backups who may take his job sooner than that, because they’re much, much cheaper. Newton is young (22) and has tools that only a few other QBs have ever had in NFL history. He’s a faster, quicker version of Daunte Culpepper in his prime, with Warren Moon arm strength, and a Tom Brady smile. Next year, this might be a Newton victory. This year, it’s still Brady.
3.) Michael Vick
2.) Jason Campbell
This year, next year, and forever, this will be Vick.
WARREN MOON REGION
1.) Drew Brees
4.) Phillip Rivers
I LOVE this matchup. The Chargers, you will remember, drafted Rivers when Brees was still there, having not developed quickly enough for them. As soon as San Diego did this, Brees became an elite QB. As it turns out, they chose wisely with Rivers too. The answer here lies in age. Brees, a Super Bowl winner and NFL MVP, is only 2 years older than Rivers. Until Phillip Rivers wins something other than a regular season game, I want Brees. Unlike the Chargers.
3.) Eli Manning
7.) Ben Roethlisberger
Either of these guys can lose you a game by standing in the pocket for too long. Either of these guys (as they’ve done a combined 3 teams) can lead you to the Super Bowl. I’ll take the guy with 2 rings who’s a year younger.
FRAN TARKENTON REGION
1.) Matthew Stafford
5.) Josh Freeman
Freeman, it needs to be said, is a great game manager. He doesn’t throw a ton of interceptions and he comes through in the clutch. Stafford, though, is a different class of QB. He looks like he’s about to take his game up another level. That level would be the A-level.
6.) Christian Ponder
2.) Joe Flacco
Joe Flacco.
THE MOSTLY ELITE 8
OTTO GRAHAM REGION
4.) Tony Romo
2.) Aaron Rodgers
Some would say that I overrate Romo, and that may be true. But I do feel he belongs in a conversation of the top 8 QBs in the NFL. He does not, however, belong in a conversation where he beats Aaron Rodgers.
STEVE YOUNG REGION
1.) Tom Brady
3.) Michael Vick
Vick, when healthy is the most dynamic player in the NFL and can change the game in ways that even Brady cannot. The problem with Vick (his fatal flaw….other than a total lack of marketability because he slaughtered dogs) is that he gets hit too much and has not proven to be durable. Some might say, “But Brady is older! Vick still has a lot of good years ahead of him!” Tom Brady is 3 years older than Vick. This is true. That Vick has suffered more diagnosed concussions this season than Brady has in his career, is the issue to me. And that’s why Brady advances.
WARREN MOON REGION
1.) Drew Brees
7.) Ben Roethlisberger
There’s really not a lot of debate here. Brees is a better QB. He might be older than Roethlisberger, but the divide in skill is wider than that in age. And then there’s the question of who you’d rather market: The nice, friendly, handsome, family man or the guy who has been twice accused of sexually assaulting women.
FRAN TARKENTON REGION
1.) Matthew Stafford
2.) Joe Flacco
This isn’t even close to me. Stafford is more accurate, has just as strong of an arm, and is three years younger. Stafford has also shown a consistence in his short career that Flacco hasn’t. Stafford’s injury-proneness is a fear, but not enough for me to take Flacco here.
FINAL FOUR
Aaron Rodgers
Matthew Stafford
I’ve already stated that Aaron Rodgers is going to win this, but it’s worth noting that Stafford (albeit with a pretty favorable draw) finds himself here in this group of QBs. He’s not there yet. In fact, he’s not even close, realistically. But he’s more than on pace, at 23 years of age, to truly belong in a discussion with Rodgers, Brees, and Brady.
Drew Brees
Tom Brady
Brady is a year and a half older than Brees. Not nearly enough to move Brees past Brady for the age reason. I’m inclined to go with Brady right away because his numbers are better in nearly every way, he’s a three-time Super Bowl winner, etc. But as the years go on, I grow to dislike something about Brady more and more. He evokes a certain Alex Rodriguez-esque quality. Like he takes himself a little too seriously. Brees, on the other hand, is an active member of the community, not strewn across the covers of supermarket rags, who is so easy to root for. With Brady, I think he’s getting bored with football. I don’t see Brees doing that. And so, somewhat hesitantly, I take Brees.
THE AARON RODGERS CHAMPIONSHIP ROUND
Aaron Rodgers
Drew Brees
Aaron Rodgers, not yet 28, is the most accurate QB in football. He possesses the things that make each of the NFL’s best, great. He’s smart like Manning, ruthless like old Tom Brady, mobile enough to make plays happen from nothing, and he’s only getting better. Unlike his predecessor in Green Bay, he seems to only help the Packers win, never facilitating a loss with a bad decision. There’s no quarterback, or player, I’d rather have on my team in the NFL today than Aaron Rodgers. And to rub salt, here are some of the players drafted before Rodgers in the first round of the 2005 NFL Draft:
1.) Alex Smith QB/49ers-Think they’d like a do-over?
6.) Pacman Jones KR/Titans-The consummate professional.
7.) Troy Williamson WR/Vikings- Yes, him.
10.) Mike Williams WR/Lions- It only took a few years for him to reach his ceiling (middling WR for terrible Seattle Seahawks)
14.) Thomas Davis LB/Panthers- You’re forgiven for not knowing who he is.
And then this list, beginning at #16, up to Rodgers at 24:
Travis Johnson
David Pollack-Hey, he has a TV show now…
Erasmus James-Minnesota would like to Erasmus this pick…..
Alex Barron
Marcus Spears-A serviceable player. Certainly the best of this crop.
Matt Jones- He of, QB to WR to unemployed fame. The only targets he’s getting now are from police.
Mark Clayton
Fabian Washington

That’s at least 13 GMs who should be out of work today for passing on Aaron Rodgers.

College Football: 1/4 Season Recap and Bold Prediction

Three weeks into the college football season (somehow a quarter of the way there for some teams) and very little clarity has taken hold. Two teams previously thought to have a chance at a National Championship game appearance have thrown themselves out of the swimming pool because of losses (Oregon to LSU and Florida State to Oklahoma). While neither team is now disqualified for a BCS National Championship appearance, neither is in very good shape. Florida State will play one more high profile regular season game (against Florida to end the season). Oregon as well plays one more high profile game (at Stanford in November). Each just needs to keep winning and hope that those above them come out flat one week.

Florida State and Oregon will get some relief on Saturday when Oklahoma State and Texas A&M square off in what boils down to an early season BCS eliminator game (I still think Texas A&M wins that one). In fact, Saturday’s schedule could clear a lot of things up. Or muddy the water further. Arkansas will face off against Alabama as they play the murderer’s row portion of their schedule (the following week they travel to Arlington, TX to play Texas A&M). A win by Arkansas over Alabama (highly possible) will vault them into the National Championship discussion and could set us up for a huge elimination style game the next week.
But we’re not going to talk about the “What if’s?”. I’m more concerned with right now. Here are my top 5 teams in the country, based on where we sit right now. Who they’ve beaten. How they’ve looked.
5. Wisconsin
-They haven’t exactly played the 2005 Texas Longhorns thus far, but they’ve looked great in pummeling some of the worst teams in FBS (UNLV, Oregon State, and Northern Illinois). Wisconsin’s biggest test will come in 8 days when they host Nebraska at Camp Randall Stadium.
For Wisconsin, the thing that makes them the most dangerous is their quarterback. As I said in the college football preview, Russell Wilson gives the Badgers something they’ve lacked for years: a real, living quarterback who can do things. Wilson is the best quarterback in the Big 10 and it’s not even close. He’s good enough to win games for a Wisconsin team that also has a great defense and a terrific running game. If they beat Nebraska, they’ll be in great shape to get to New Orleans in January.
4. Stanford
-Andrew Luck. And also, Andrew Luck.
Not only did Stanford take care of their only early challenge (at an Arizona team that I’ve grossly overrated), but they did it easily. Luck has been machine-like so far, posting a 67% completion pct, while throwing for 786 yards in 3 games, with an 8:1 TD to INT ratio. You know, just like Andrew Luck. Stanford is off this week before four straight games against the weak links of the Pac 12. They should be 7-0 heading into a game against a USC team that has looked wholly beatable this season.
3. Boise State
-People, as is their wont, will say that the Georgia win means nothing. They’re wrong. They’ll also say the trouncing of Toledo is nothing to crow about. They’re wrong. Boise has faced two opponents this season and dominated them both. And that’s all they’ll need to do to get to New Orleans as far as I’m concerned. You cannot, in good conscience, leave an undefeated Boise State team out of the national championship game at the benefit of a one-loss any conference team. Not with Chris Peterson. Not with Kellen Moore. Not with the years of success they’ve had. The BCS is supposed to be about having the two best teams in the country face each other for a championship. If Boise is undefeated at season’s end, they’re one of those two best teams.
2. Oklahoma
-The offense didn’t look particularly swift in beating Florida State on Saturday night. And the defense didn’t exactly have to contend with a machine in the FSU offense. But the Sooners looked solid. They got to FSU QB EJ Manuel. They caused turnovers. And they won handily, on the road, something they haven’t done much recently. And they did it without Landry Jones playing his best game at QB. The rest of the schedule is a challenge (games against Oklahoma State and Texas A&M namely, not to mention the rivalry game against a Texas team who is much better now with Colt McCoy II at QB.). The Sooners are a very good team. They’re a veteran group who is ready for the big time. That schedule, though, is filled with big time.
1. Louisiana State
-No one has impressed more than LSU in the first 3 weeks of the season. They trounced Oregon in Dallas and manhandled Mississippi State in Starkville. They’ve looked like world beaters.
They are not world beaters. There’s a formula for beating LSU. It involves spreading the field to throw short. The Tigers secondary is their weakest link. The Tigers dared Oregon to pass, but Darron Thomas is not Joey Harrington. The Ducks tried to attack the deep secondary and got pummeled. The formula for beating LSU will be on display Saturday in Morgantown, West Virginia when the Mountaineers shock a lot of people by beating LSU. Dana Holgerson (and his fabulous hair) has the system best served to beat a team like LSU. Speed and a capable quarterback. Don’t be surprised if West Virginia only runs the ball 8 times on Saturday. You don’t beat LSU by running the ball. You beat them by throwing it and making Jarrett Lee, LSU’s much maligned 9th year senior QB, throw the ball. For now, the Tigers occupy the top spot here. Come next Monday, that won’t be the case.

2011 NFL Predictions

Remember my NCAA preview and it’s mind-numbing length? Let’s be pithy with the NFL preview. And instead of calling it a “preview” we’ll call it “pithy predictions.” We’ve all got things to do.

AFC

East
1. New York Jets
(The defense is still very good and I tend to think we’ll see Mark Sanchez take the next step and enter the B-level QB club with guys like Matt Schaub and Eli Manning. And that’s pretty scary if you know who Matt Schaub is.)
2. New England Patriots
(Originally my Super Bowl pick, I then remembered they haven’t won a playoff game since the Super Bowl loss to the Giants. And this team looks an awful lot like last year’s team.)
3. Buffalo Bills
(They will be much improved this year. They could be an 8-8 football team.)
4. Miami Dolphins
(They won’t be an 8-8 football team. But hey, Andrew Luck!)

North
1. Pittsburgh Steelers
(Surprise: They’re very good.)
2. Cleveland Browns
(Surprise: I think they’re a playoff team and Colt McCoy will be a big reason why.)
3. Baltimore Ravens
(They’re a little old on the defensive side of the ball and a lot boring on the other side. Not a winning formula.)
4. Cincinnati Bengals
(Whatever they’re doing is not a winning formula. But hey, Andrew Luck!)

South
1. Tennessee Titans
(Because I’m crazy enough to believe that Matt Hasselbeck has one more inexplicable year in him.)
2. Houston Texans
(I’m not quite ready to put a team that has never made the playoffs in the Super Bowl. Sorry.)
3. Indianapolis Colts
(Not so much because of Peyton Manning’s neck. More so because they’re “not very good” defensively.)
4. Jacksvonville Jaguars
(Blaine Gabbert-Be warned about how they treat QBs. And you’re not even a good one.)

West
1. San Diego Chargers
(They’re so much better than the other 3 teams in this division, they shouldn’t even have to play them.)
2. Kansas City Chiefs
(Like the Houston Texans, except they actually made the playoffs last year.)
3. Denver Broncos
(I like Kyle Orton. But there’s not a lot here to help him.)
4. Oakland Raiders
(I don’t like Jason Campbell and there’s really not much to help him. But hey, Andrew Luck!)
AFC Playoffs
#3. Pittsburgh Steelers over #6. New England Patriots
#5 Cleveland Browns over #4. Tennessee Titans
#3 Pittsburgh Steelers over #1 San Diego Chargers
#2 New York Jets over #5 Cleveland Browns
#2 New York Jets over #3 Pittsburgh Steelers
NFC

East
1. Philadelphia Eagles
(They’re not as good as everyone thinks, but that’s just because they’re not going 16-0.)
2. Dallas Cowboys
(They’re the Cheesecake Factory of football teams. A little bit of everything. Not particularly great anywhere. Very loud.)
3. New York Giants
(They’re the Red Lobster of football teams. That’s to say, I have no interest in Red Lobster.)
4. Washington Redskins
(They’re the “Eating from the dumpster outside of Applebee’s” of football teams. But hey, Andrew Luck.)
North
1. Green Bay Packers
(They’re better than last year. They happened to win the Super Bowl last year. But will they be hungry?)
2. Detroit Lions
(The greatest team to ever play football despite having no defensive secondary to speak of. The hopes are a little too high.)
3. Minnesota Vikings
(There’s no team in 2011 that I’d rather not watch.)
4. Chicago Bears
(I smell a giant disaster coming out of Soldier Field. That should be fun to watch.)
South
1. Atlanta Falcons
(I’m driving the bandwagon. Hope aboard.)
2. New Orleans Saints
(A trendy pick for a team with a stable of unhealthy running backs, streaky wide receivers, and a middle-of-the-pack defense.)
3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
(Want to watch a team fall hard this year? Watch the Bears. Want to watch a team buy into their hype only to finish 7-9? Watch Tampa.)
4. Carolina Panthers
(They’ll win 5 games. Cam Newton will have a lot to do with that.)
West
1. St. Louis Rams
(Because it won’t be anyone else.)
2. Arizona Cardinals
(Not a wild card team. But hey, Kevin Kolb?)
3. San Francisco 49ers
(Not a wild card team. But hey, Andrew Luck.)
4. Seattle Seahawks
(Not a wild card team. But hey, Andrew Luck.)
NFC Playoffs
#3 Philadelphia Eagles over #6 Detroit Lions
#5 Dallas Cowboys over #4 St. Louis Rams
#1 Green Bay Packers over #5 Dallas Cowboys
#2 Atlanta Falcons over #3 Philadelphia Eagles
#1 Green Bay Packers over #2 Atlanta Falcons
SUPER BOWL WHATEVER NUMBER THIS IS
New York Jets over Green Bay Packers
NFL MVP: Phillip Rivers
NFL Offensive Player of the Year: Phillip Rivers
NFL Defensive Player of the Year: Ndamukong Suh
NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year: Julio Jones
NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year: Marcell Dareus
NFL Coach of the Year: Pat Shurmur

2011 College Football Preview or How Many Tattoos Can I Get For My Autographed John Jaha Baseball?

I began last year’s college football preview with a bit about how I was not particularly exuberant for the start of the season. I will not begin this season’s preview with the same sentiment. In fact, you will see from the over 6,000 words below, that I am very excited for the 2011 season.

We enter the college football season with story lines galore. From Andrew Luck returning for his junior year at Stanford, to Ohio State’s fall from grace, to Miami’s nostalgia for the days of the “U”, to Oregon’s quest to avenge last year’s National Championship game loss, to Alabama’s QB situation, to Brady Hoke taking over at Michigan, to conference realignment.

I’d like to start with Andrew Luck though because frankly, first is a place he should get used to. In April of 2012, barring a tragedy, he’ll be the NFL’s #1 overall pick. He’s the most polished quarterback since Peyton Manning. Impeccably accurate, blessed with a strong arm, blessed with size, and, unlike Manning, as athletic a pocket passer as you’ll ever see. In fact, the Manning comparison isn’t quite apt, as far as quarterbacks go. He’s much more like Aaron Rodgers. Just bigger. And faster. And at this point in his career, a better QB.

To me though, what sets Luck apart is his decision making off the field. You will not read Andrew Luck’s name in newspaper clippings (because you don’t read newspapers) about bar fights. He won’t be taking money from, as former University of Miami coach Jimmy Johnson calls them, “jock sniffers.” He won’t be beating up women. He won’t be driving drunk. What he will be doing is attaining his degree, from Stanford no less, in Architectural Design and Engineering. Not Communication Studies. Not Family Studies. Not “Undeclared.” No, Luck, a Junior, will be graduating in May with a degree in Architectural Design and Engineering. All while quarterbacking a major college program looking for their first National Championship since 1926 and their third consecutive winning season (all under Luck).

Of course, the loudest story line coming into the 2011 season won’t be Andrew Luck’s return. It will instead be scandal. Scandals at Ohio State, Miami, and Oregon. I need not rehash any of these stories in great detail. The Buckeyes lost their head coach and quarterback to a memorabilia selling scandal. The Hurricanes are facing major sanctions from the NCAA after a convicted felon confessed to having given dozens of Canes players money and cars while they were playing at the school. And the Ducks recently released a running back recruit who was brought to the school by a shady Texan street agent named Willie Lyles, who confessed to a $25,000 payment to him by the Ducks head coach, Chip Kelly. And yes, that’s actually the man’s name. Willie Lyles. “Shady” and guys named “Willie Lyles” go hand-in-hand. You’d almost assuredly hear the phrase “smooth talking” used to describe a man named Willie Lyles. Back to business.

The Oregon recruiting scandal will be a bit of a black cloud hanging over the program as they will assuredly contend for a National Championship in 2011. The biggest question marks come in the form of replacing star WR Jeffrey Maehl and revamping an offensive line that got thinner following graduations. The Ducks, though, do return starting QB Darron Thomas and the electric running back tandem of LaMichael James and Kenjon Barner, Though the 2011 schedule will be a tough road to hoe. More on that later, though.

Alabama is, without question, one of the best teams on paper in college football. There is one glaring shortcoming though in Tuscaloosa (time will tell if it is a major or minor one): Quarterback. The Crimson Tide lost Greg McElroy to graduation and come into the 2011 season with the inexperienced AJ McCarron and the even more inexperienced Phillip Sims. McCarron is a lanky pocket passer. Sims is a strong armed freshman with some mobility. McCarron is the only of the two with any SEC experience. And it wasn’t a very good show, as he came in for the injured McElroy in last year’s Iron Bowl and was unable to rally Alabama from behind to beat the eventual National Champions, Auburn. I have a feeling that Alabama coach Nick Saban will go with McCarron initially, hoping to not lose any games (a road test at Penn State looms in Week 2) before eventually turning to Sims out of necessity. I don’t anticipate great things from McCarron. Sims could be great. Luckily for Alabama, their defense should be good enough to hide the QB growing pains before the SEC schedule begins in earnest on September 24th against Arkansas.

Brady Hoke is taking over at Michigan. People will talk a lot about this, because it’s Michigan and Hoke, San Diego State’s former Head Coach, is a relative unknown to most. They’ll talk about his no-nonsense approach. A lunch pail attitude in Ann Arbor. A different kind of Shoelace (Michigan QB Denard Robinson, who, if you weren’t aware, plays with untied shoes). Michigan will go 7-5. The more things change….

The other annoying story line that you’ll hear lots about is conference realignment. The Big 12 now has 10 teams. The Big 10 now has 12 teams. The Pac-10 is now the Pac12. Boise State moved from the WAC to the Mountain West. Texas Christian is moving from the Mountain West after the season to the Big East. Brigham Young is now a football independent, much like Notre Dame is. Got it? Who’s ready for some football?

ACC

Always a boring place to start, but my life philosophy is to always get the tough stuff out of the way first. And if there’s anything tougher than staying interested in the ACC, well, it’s staying interested in the Big East.

Much like any other year in the Atlantic Coast Conference, it seemingly comes down to two teams: Virginia Tech and Florida State. What makes 2011 different, I guess, is that Florida State is the clear favorite to win the conference and to contend for a National Championship. The Seminoles and Hokies do not play in the regular season, though it appears very likely we’ll see them meet in Charlotte/Jacksonville/Tampa/Macon/Wherever the ACC Championship is held this year, in December. Virginia Tech’s toughest conference test will be a home game on Octoer 8th against Miami, who at that point in the season may have already imploded. Even having lost starting QB Tyrod Taylor, Virginia Tech should be able to run the table during their regular season. Which says more about the ACC than it does Virginia Tech.

Florida State’s road is tougher than Virginia Tech’s and involves a non-conference showdown against the nation’s #1 team, Oklahoma. Last year, the Sooners took the ‘Noles to the woodshed, beating them in OK by 30. This year, the ‘Noles are better and hosting the Sooners. I’ll write a little bit about the non conference schedule later, but just know that this is one of two potential National Championship matchups that we’ll see in September.

Maryland and North Carolina State are the in-conference “contenders.” Maryland brings in former UConn coach Randy Edsall to lead an experienced team coming off of a 9-4 season. North Carolina State is led by coach Tom O’Brien, who may be on the hottest seat in the nation. He’ll need to get a lot out of super-recruit Mike Glennon to have a shot at the ACC Atlantic Division title. I doubt it will happen for either.

Atlantic Division (conference records in parenthesis)

1. Florida State (8-0)

2. North Carolina State (5-3)

3. Maryland (5-3)

4. Clemson (4-4)

5. Boston College (3-5)

6. Wake Forest (0-8)

Coastal Division

1. Virginia Tech (8-0)

2. North Carolina (6-2)

3. Georgia Tech (4-4)

4. Miami (4-4)

5. Duke (1-7)

6. Virginia (1-7)

ACC Championship: Florida State over Virginia Tech 28-13

Big East

The Big East does not deserve to be mentioned here. If I’m going to talk about the Big East, I may as well talk about the Sun Belt Conference. Regardless, predicted order of finish and thus, victim in the Orange Bowl, to follow.

1. West Virginia (6-1)

2. South Florida (5-2)

3. Cincinnati (4-3)

4. Pittsburgh (4-3)

5. Louisville (4-3)

6. Connecticut (3-4)

7. Syracuse (2-5)

8. Rutgers (1-6)

Big 12 (The One With 10 Teams)

The Big 12 lost two Northern Division members (and thus, the divisions) to the Pac 12 (Colorado) and Big 10 (the one with 12 teams) (Nebraska). The loss of Colorado hurts like a feather blowing onto your arm in the cool summer breeze. In fact, most people will not notice that Colorado has gone west, so to speak. The loss of Nebraska hurts this conference more though. Nebraska was a traditional Big 8 (the previous incarnation of the Big 12) team and the standard bearer of the conference. Losing Nebraska hurts the Big 12’s credibility in the long-term. In the short-term, it means that Oklahoma, Missouri, Oklahoma State, and Texas A&M don’t have to compete with the Husker’s strong D. Instead, they can make like the Big 12 does (of late) and have a good ol’ fashioned, 4 hour, no huddle shootout every Saturday afternoon.

For a conference historically aligned with option rushing attacks and powerful rush defenses, the Big 12 certainly doesn’t look like it is supposed to. The above teams (in addition to Baylor, Texas Tech, and Texas) have no intention to ground and pound. The Big 12’s best teams do it in the air with no huddle offenses, five wide receiver sets, and 400 yard passing days. And the conference features a handful of very good QBs.

If you’re going to start somewhere, you start with the Oklahoma Sooners who will begin 2011 as the #1 rated team in the country. The Sooners are led by New Mexico native Landry Jones at QB. Jones has made great strides in his career since taking over for an injured Sam Bradford in a 2009 loss to BYU. In that game, Jones looked like the Freshman that he was. Jones is a lanky, fairly polished passer with the best WR duo in college football in Ryan Broyles and Kenny Stills. Jones took huge steps forward last year, passing for 4700 yards and 38 TDs. It’s very likely that 2011 could be a 5,000 yard season for the Junior.

Not to be forgotten about in the Sooner State is 27 year old Oklahoma State QB Brandon Weeden and his primary target, receiver Justin Blackmon. Oklahoma State was second in the nation (Oklahoma was third) in passing yards in 2010 and that will not change too much in 2011, despite losing their Offensive Coordinator ,Dana Holgorsen, to a head coaching job in West Virginia. Blackmon is a future first round NFL draft pick with great hands and good speed. Weeden is a smart and accurate passer. Smart because he throws to Blackmon. And accurate because, well, he throws to Blackmon.

Further south, down in the Lone Star State, is Ryan Tannehill at Texas A&M, Tannehill, a wide receiver coming into 2010, took over for senior QB Jerrod Johnson last season against Kansas and led the Aggies to the Cotton Bowl, winning 6 of 7 games, including a win in Austin over rival Texas. Tannehill returns in 2011 leading the more balanced (than the Oklahoma kids) Aggies into a season with the highest of expectations in College Station. Tannehill may not be the passer that Jones and Weeden are, but he makes up for that with his mobility and arm strength.

Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Texas A&M all enter the season ranked in the Top 10, all expected by their fan bases to win the conference. The Sooners play at Oklahoma State, but host the Aggies. The Cowboys host the Sooners, but play at the Aggies. And, well, you can figure out Texas A&M’s scenario (I hope).

The Cowboys have the toughest road, playing 5 conference games on the road. Oklahoma does as well, but the Sooners get the advantage of playing the conference’s fourth best team, Missouri, at home. We’ll find out very early on which team, between the Cowboys and Aggies, has the inside track to challenging the Sooners for the conference title. OK State and Texas A&M play in College Station on September 24th. I expect an A&M victory. I do not, however, expect an Aggie victory in Norman. Nor do I expect a Cowboy victory over their arch rival. Oklahoma is a notch ahead of both the Aggies and Cowboys defensively. All of these games will be close, but a 51-48 victory is just as good as a 17-14 one.

1. Oklahoma (9-0)

2. Texas A&M (8-1)

3. Oklahoma State (7-2)

4. Missouri (6-3)

5. Texas (5-4)

6. Baylor (4-5)

7. Texas Tech (3-6)

8. Kansas State (2-7)

9. Kansas (1-8)

10. Iowa State (0-9)

Big 10 (The One With 12 Teams)

Taking a page from the Big 12, stylistically (the other thing they’ve taken is Nebraska), the Big 10 tried to become a passing league last year, seemingly out of nowhere. Michigan State, led by Kirk Cousins had a solid 11-2 campaign. Northwestern, while they finished just a game over .500 became interesting to watch thanks to the passing prowess of Dan Persa. Still, the Spartans and Wildcats are outliers in a league where teams want to run the football. Wisconsin found itself in last year’s Rose Bowl thanks to a top 25 rushing offense and a top 25 overall defense, in the classic Big 10 mold. Likewise for Sugar Bowl participant Ohio State. Same story for Nebraska who was top 10 nationally in rushing offense and scoring defense (while playing in the electric, aerial Big 12).

The biggest story line for 2011 in the Big 10, even with the addition of Nebraska, is the fall of the Ohio State Buckeyes. Still, those expecting a precipitous dropoff in Columbus will be left disappointed. The Buckeyes are still loaded with 5 star recruits and even if receiver DeVier Posey and starting running back Dan Herron are suspended for the first four games, the only challenges are a game at a Miami team that may have already given up, and then an October 1st game in East Lansing against Michigan State that I wouldn’t have picked Ohio State to win even with Terrelle Pryor and Jim Tressel. I expect the Buckeyes to contend. But they’ll be contending for a trip to the Alamo Bowl. Still, a success given where they’re starting.

The best team in the conference in my opinion is the newest member. Nebraska brings one of the nation’s best defenses and a spread option run attack that worked very well against the Big 10’s slower defenses at Michigan under Rich Rodriguez. The problem with Michigan was that their defense was terrible. Nebraska’s won’t be. And the schedule favors the Huskers with only one true road test, at the conference’s second best team, Wisconsin, on October 1.

Wisconsin comes into the season fairly under the radar for a team that represented the conference in the Rose Bowl last year and has the highest profile transfer under center. Former North Carolina State QB Russell Wilson left the Wolfpack after last season and now finds himself in Madison. He is without question the best QB at Wisconsin in over a decade. Wilson is fully capable of winning games in the air or on the ground. He’s nowhere near as dynamic as Denard Robinson in Ann Arbor, but he’s more effective. And with 4 years as a starting QB under his belt, Wilson knows how to play the position at this level. He gives the Badgers something that they have lacked for quite some time: a QB capable of doing more than managing games. Wilson can win them.

Of course, with the Big 10 possessing 12 teams, there’s a conference championship game, which sets us up for a possible rematch between the Huskers and Badgers in December. On a neutral field, I like Nebraska’s athleticism over the Badgers’ physicality. I think Wisconsin wins the regular season game thanks to the home field advantage.. But that won’t send them to the Rose Bowl this year.

Legends Division

1. Nebraska (7-1)

2. Michigan State (6-2)

3. Northwestern (6-2)

4. Michigan (4-4)

5. Minnesota (3-5)

6. Iowa (2-6)

Leaders Division

1. Wisconsin (8-0)

2. Ohio State (5-3)

3. Penn State (4-4)

4. Illinois (3-5)

5. Purdue (1-7)

6. Indiana (0-8)

Big 10 Championship: Nebraska over Wisconsin 13-10

Pac 12

Much like last season, I think the Pac 12 is the second best conference in America. This is due in large part to the wide swath of talent. The Pac 12 features three elite teams (Oregon, Stanford, and USC) and a group of teams with potential to contend for a conference title (Utah, Washington, and Arizona). Of course, there are the bottom feeders (Washington State and Colorado). But the top level talent in the Pac 12, especially offensively, is there. And unlike the Big 12 (the one with 10), these teams can play some defense.

Oregon comes in as most people’s favorite in the conference and it’s fairly easy to see why. Their offense is a marvel to watch with speed at every position, right down to the undersized, super athletic offensive line. The questions for this year are whether both lines will hold up with a handful of new faces being plugged in. And it’s a big question. If Oregon’s defense can’t get quick 3-and-outs, it puts a hole in coach Chip Kelly’s intention to keep his opposing defense on the field and tired. And that’s the inherent flaw in this style of offense. Your defense becomes your biggest enemy. It’s totally overlooked by most, but a great example is Auburn’s defense last year. If not for the presence of a transcendent QB (Cam Newton) the Tigers would have been a 3 or 4 loss team. Their defense could not help the offense keep teams on the field. Instead it helped opposing teams keep points on the board. Darron Thomas is good. Darron Thomas is not Cam Newton. And that may be a big problem for the Ducks.

If you’re looking for 2011’s transcendent player, look no further than the beautiful Palo Alto, California and the previously talked about Andrew Luck. Outside of a lack of premium talent at the skill positions (other than QB), Stanford’s potential Achilles heel is the departure of Head Coach Jim Harbaugh. However, there are very few (just one) early challenges on Stanford’s road to a Pac 12 Championship. There’s enough time for the Cardinal to adjust to new coach David Shaw’s philosophies. And it’s not like Shaw is a new face. He’s been the Offensive Coordinator at Stanford for 4 years. Outside of a trip to Tucson on September 17th, the Cardinal do not play a conference contender until October 29 in LA against USC. Of course, the centerpiece game on the schedule comes on November 12 when Oregon travels to Palo Alto. And, as opposed to the 2010 game in Eugene, the Cardinal will be able to hold onto a lead. And they’ll win.

So, Stanford is going to go undefeated, right? Well, no. That roadblock on the 29th of October is interesting. See, the USC Trojans have nothing to play for in 2011, but pride. They are not eligible to appear in any polls. They can’t play in the Pac 12 Title Game. They can’t play in a bowl game. And while it seems senseless to put stock into a team with nothing to play for, it’s worth noting that the Trojans are likely the most talented all-around team in the conference and they themselves are led by a potential top 5 NFL Draft pick in QB Matt Barkley. I’d be fascinated to hear the preseason prognostication if the Trojans had something to play for in 2011. But with Lane Kiffin’s ego and Matt Barkley likely to leave for the NFL (and wanting to prove himself to be the second best QB in the draft) I think USC plays for the only thing they can get: respect. And nothing would make that mark more than a win over Stanford and Andrew Luck.

North Division

1. Stanford (8-1)

2. Oregon (8-1)

3. Washington (4-5)

4. California (3-7)

5. Oregon State (2-7)

6. Washington State (1-8)

South Division

1. USC (8-1)

2. Arizona (6-3)

3. Utah (6-3)

4. UCLA (5-4)

5. Arizona State (4-5)

6. Colorado (0-10)

Pac-12 Championship: Stanford over Arizona (USC not eligible) 35-21

SEC

College football’s national champion has come from the SEC each of the last six seasons. So you’d think, “Why would that change in 2011?” If I’m to look for a reason why, I would say it’s because the conference isn’t as good in 2011 as it has been in years past. Alabama may be the second rated team in the country, but they’re not a sure thing on offense. LSU is a sure thing on defense, but not on offense (and they may be close to losing starting QB Jordan Jefferson as he is under police investigation for a bar brawl in Baton Rouge). Florida has questions at QB and an entirely new coaching staff, including first time head coach Will Muschamp (formerly the D-Coordinator in Austin). Auburn may be the defending national champ, but they are returning fewer starters than any other Division I program this season. And one of those starters, Heisman Trophy winner Cam Newton, will be impossible to replace, especially with the options available down on the Plains. The job will likely fall to junior Barrett Trotter, though don’t be surprised to see super frosh Kiehl Frazier getting snaps behind center at some point in the season. Arkansas was thought to be a dark horse contender, until they lost star running back Knile Davis to a season ending ankle injury. Mississippi State is improving rapidly, but they’re a year away. Tennessee is improving slowly and a few years away. Georgia has a good quarterback (Aaron Murray), a desperate coach (Mark Richt), and not much else.

If you noticed that someone is missing (and I’m not talking about Kentucky, Vanderbilt, or Ole Miss), you are right. And if you think there’s a reason why they’re missing, you’re also right.

The missing team for those of you in the dark resides in Columbia, South Carolina. They’re coached by a National Championship winning head coach, quarterbacked by a 4-year starter, led in the backfield by arguably the nation’s best running back, flanked out wide by the nation’s best wide receiver, bring in the nation’s top overall recruit onto an already solid defensive line, and have a solid defensive secondary, anchored by cornerback Stephon Gilmore, a potential All-American in his Sophomore season.

The pedigree is certainly lacking from a historical perspective for the University of South Carolina Gamecocks. But pedigree aside, on paper, this is the conference’s best overall team, with Alabama not very far behind. Most would point to often troubled Gamecock QB Stephen Garcia as a glaring weakness for the program. However, I don’t. Garcia can manage a game pretty well. And he’s got two All-American security blankets in RB Marcus Lattimore and the fabulous, majestic, near perfect Alshon Jeffrey at WR.

Contending for a National Championship would be a huge step up for a team that was 9-5 last season (5-3 in the SEC) and played in the Chick-Fil-A Bowl, losing to Florida State. What South Carolina has in their favor is a relatively easy SEC schedule. No Alabama. No LSU. Road games at Georgia, Arkansas, Mississippi State, and Tennessee. All are winnable. None will be easy. It’s likely that the Gamecocks slip up somewhere along the way. The home schedule is even less of a challenge, with Florida being the only conference contender coming to Columbia. If nothing else, the Gamecocks will be in Atlanta in December as SEC East champions. Who will they play?

Alabama. That’s all. I don’t really need to write more do I?

East Division

1. South Carolina (7-1)

2. Florida (5-3)

3. Georgia (5-3)

4. Tennessee (2-6)

5. Vanderbilt (1-5)

6. Kentucky (0-8)

West Division

1. Alabama (7-1)

2. Mississippi State (6-2)

3. LSU (6-2)

4. Arkansas (4-4)

5. Auburn (4-4)

6. Ole Miss (2-6)

SEC Championship South Carolina over Alabama 17-14

Mountain West

If you came here looking for me to break down Wyoming’s spread offense, you came to the wrong place. The Mountain West as far as I’m considered comes down to 3 teams. Really, just 2. But the Air Force Academy is an interesting matchup for most teams because they still run an option- run offense. I don’t think that Boise State or Texas Christian will lose to Air Force, but the Falcons will make it interesting.

No, this is all about one game. November 12 in beautiful Boise, Idaho. This will be the only year that Boise State and TCU are in the same conference. And this game could decide a lot. And “a lot” does not necessarily mean the Mountain West title. I think TCU will be playing spoilers. They will know that they stand between Boise and a trip to New Orleans in January. The Mountain West took this home game away from the Horned Frogs and moved it from Fort Worth to Boise when they defected to the Big East (where they will begin play next season). It was a bad move by the conference to treat the team that brought it so much good football publicity with such disregard. The Big East move was something TCU had to do to compete for BCS bowl berths every year. And on their way out of the office after years of great work, instead of being given a plaque for service, they got handed one last, very difficult, assignment.

On top of the middle finger motivation, TCU also would love to avenge a loss to Boise State in 2010’s Fiesta Bowl. The two schools have developed a rivalry despite having rarely played in their histories. Make no mistake, there will be no bigger game in the 2011 regular season than the one on November 12. You’ll find no more emotion. No more passion. No more will. In most other cases this season, teams can afford a loss. It seems like that kind of season. This is the exception.

So who wins? Boise wins a brutal, physical, game with an end of game Kellen Moore TD pass, by a score of 24-21. And that makes Boise State 12-0. And you know what that means.

Independents

There are two independents who warrant mention in terms of the big picture of the 2011 college football season. One, Notre Dame, comes in with high expectations. The other, Brigham Young, comes in under the national radar. Both of those things will change fairly early in the season.

For Notre Dame, it seems like every three years they inexplicably appear in the Preseason AP Top 25. People say, “This is the year.” I’ve even seen some experts pick the Irish to play in the National Championship (seriously, people employed by major networks (CBS in this case) making that pick). That won’t happen. In fact, it won’t even come close to happening.

Last year, Notre Dame finished the regular season 7-5, but won the Sun Bowl convincingly over Miami to wrap up the season at 8-5. This, for whatever reason, has led to the high expectations. Never mind that coach Brian Kelly just settled on a starting QB (incumbent Dayne Crist over sophomore Tommy Rees) this week. Never mind that the schedule poses a number of challenges. Never mind that Crist has done nothing in his career to distinguish himself. It’s Notre Dame. And they won the last game they played. Let the hype begin. I think the Irish finish 8-4. Losses to Michigan, Michigan State, USC, and Stanford.

As for BYU, they’re not going to come onto the national radar because I expect them to win a lot of games. No, for those unfamiliar with the story, BYU has made itself a football independent (they’ll join the West Coast Conference (the one with Gonzaga and Saint Mary’s) in basketball) beginning this season. And with that independence comes a contract with ESPN to air most of the Cougars games in 2011. You’ll see BYU playing Utah State, Central Florida, and Hawaii (among others) in 2011 on your televisions. And you’ll likely think to yourself at some point, “Wait, BYU is on AGAIN???!!!” Make no mistake, the early stages of this agreement will benefit those in Provo more than those in Bristol, as the program looks to schedule marquee games across an entire season in upcoming years. It will be a challenge for the university. BYU will not be a top or second tier team in 2011. But they’ll certainly get the TV coverage, which is great exposure for the school (read: LDS faith) as they try to push themselves towards Notre Dame-type status.

The Cougars have a few minor challenges on the road (Ole Miss and Oregon State) and then some major ones (Texas and TCU). The rest of the schedule sees BYU playing only one major program (its arch rival Utah). I expect an 8-4 season for the Cougars. Sophomore QB Jake Heaps ended the 2010 season with 5 of 6 victories and played much better down the stretch, all as a true freshman. The offensive line, especially on the ends, is solid and will keep the young QB upright. The question will be whether Heaps can take the next step and become a top tier QB. If he does, we’ll not only be seeing the Cougars a lot in the coming year, but hearing about them as well.

Non-Conference

I’ve purposely avoided talking about the non-conference schedule above because I believe it warrants its own section. And it gets started very early on.

Week 1:

TCU at Baylor- A tough test for the TCU defense as it goes up against dynamic QB Robert Griffin III. They’ll be up to the task. Something to watch: TCU QB Casey Pachall taking over for the departed Andy Dalton. The Baylor defense will not pose a difficult threat, but it’ll be interesting to see where his confidence level is. Expect a 100 yard game from RB Ed Wesley.

Boise State vs Georgia- The game is being played in Atlanta, but don’t worry, it’s a “neutral site game.” So what if Athens, GA is 70 miles from the Georgia Dome. Kidding aside, this is as good as a road game for Boise State, which is fine. In 2005, Boise State set itself back years by traveling to Athens and getting taken out back by the Bulldogs. This Georgia team is not as good as that team and this Boise team is better than that Boise team. And it will show. It has to for the Broncos. A loss here would be devastating for the school. They’ll win comfortably. At least they better hope so.

Oregon vs. LSU- This game is another neutral site affair, coming to you from Cowboys Stadium. Both teams come in ranked in the top 5, though both come in with question marks. An Oregon loss will essentially take them out of the national title race. LSU can afford a close loss. I’ve gone back and forth on this game. I’m not quite sure who has the advantage. Oregon should be more motivated. LSU’s defense is a world better than the Auburn defense that beat the Ducks in Glendale, AZ last January. Right now, I’ll take the Ducks. I don’t know that LSU’s defense will be in the shape it needs to be to play Oregon’s offense. And for the Ducks, they just need to hope they can stop the Tigers a few times offensively. LSU is no juggernaut there, so it shouldn’t be too much of a problem. Unless the Pac-12 is really as inferior as the SEC nation would like you to think. On this night, it won’t be. Oregon wins a close one.

Week 2:

Arizona at Oklahoma State- An early season test for the dynamic Oklahoma State offense. They’ll dismiss of the Wildcats fairly easily on one side of the ball, but I wonder about their ability to stop Arizona’s QB/WR combo of Nick Foles and Juron Criner. It’ll be a good test for the Cowboys defense. I like them to win a 45-31 type shootout.

Alabama at Penn State- Someone will say something about how the Nittany Lions are going to lay it all out and win a big one for Joe. They’ll be very wrong. Very, very wrong.

Notre Dame at Michigan- The first night game ever at Michigan Stadium. Brady Hoke’s first test. Michigan surprises some people and puts a hole in the “Notre Dame for National Championship” movement.

Week 3:

Oklahoma at Florida State- I mean, an absolute mega game. The loser will lose all hope of playing for a championship because of the conference they play in. Oklahoma wins a close one.

Ohio State at Miami- Call it the Scandal Bowl. Also call it a Buckeyes victory.

Auburn at Clemson- Neither team is likely to make a run at New Orleans, but the game deserves mention because of how close Clemson came to beating Auburn last season. They’ll come so close this year that they’ll actually do it.

Week 4:

LSU at West Virginia- The Mountaineers nearly won last season in Baton Rouge. If they get the job done this season, it’ll go a long way towards Big East supremacy, er, legitimacy. West Virginia keeps it close but loses to the Tigers.

Week 5:

Texas A&M vs. Arkansas- This one will also take place in Cowboys Stadium. Unlike the previous two meetings, I think the Aggies win this one and keep their National Title dreams alive.

After Week 5, conference play begins, in earnest. Of course, there are a few rivalry games at the end of the season (Florida State v. Florida, Georgia v. Georgia Tech). You won’t really need to plan your schedule around any of these games.

Non-BCS Bowl Projections

I’ve never tried this before and it’s very likely that I won’t predict a single game correctly, but if you’re still reading, you likely have very little to live for. So I’ll extend your life a little longer. This was much more of a challenge than I expected it to be. Also worth noting to those of you unfamiliar with college football that these are actual bowl games. You’ll also hear people in late December complaining about how there’s too many bowl games. This is because people like to complain about things that affect them in no way at all. Bowl games are good. They allow teams to play one more game and receive a payout from a willing sponsor. If R+L Carriers wants to give a few hundred thousand dollars to the 3rd place team in Conference USA, why should I complain? No one has ever been tied into a chair and forced to watch the Little Caesars Pizza Bowl. Let the kids play.

New Mexico Bowl: Arizona State vs. San Diego State

Famous Potatoes Bowl: Northern Illinois vs. Fresno State

R+L Carriers New Orleans Bowl: Troy vs. Southern Mississippi

Beef O’Brady’s Bowl: UConn vs. Central Florida

San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl: Air Force vs. Nevada

MAACO Bowl: TCU vs. UCLA

Sheraton Hawaii Bowl: Tulsa vs. Ohio

Advocare V100 Independence Bowl: Colorado State vs. Boston College

Little Caesars Pizza Bowl: Toledo vs. Penn State

Belk Bowl: Louisville vs. Clemson

Military Bowl: Navy vs. Maryland

Bridgepoint Education Holiday Bowl: Texas vs. Utah

Champs Sports Bowl: Notre Dame vs. Miami

Valero Alamo Bowl: Missouri vs. Arizona

Bell Helicopter Armed Forces Bowl: BYU vs. Houston

New Era Pinstripe Bowl: Texas Tech vs. Cincinnati

Franklin American Mortgage Music City Bowl: Georgia Tech vs. Auburn

Insight Bowl: Ohio State vs. Oklahoma State

Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas: Northwestern vs. Baylor

Hyundai Sun Bowl: South Florida vs. Washington

AutoZone Liberty Bowl: Tennessee vs. East Carolina

Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl: Utah State vs. Army

Chick Fil-A Bowl: Virginia Tech vs. Georgia

Capital One Bowl: Wisconsin vs. Mississippi State

Gator Bowl: Michigan vs. Arkansas

Outback Bowl: Michigan State vs. Florida

Cotton Bowl: Texas A&M vs. LSU

BBVA Compass Bowl: Pittsburgh vs. Florida Atlantic

Godaddy.com Bowl: Middle Tennessee vs. Temple

BCS

To set up my BCS projections, let’s take a look at our Big 6 conference champions:

ACC: Florida State

Big East: West Virginia

Big 12 (the one with 10): Oklahoma *

Big 10 (the one with 12): Nebraska

Pac 12: Stanford

SEC: South Carolina

At-Large:

Boise State *

Alabama

Oregon

Wisconsin

Rose Bowl: Stanford over Nebraska

Sugar Bowl: South Carolina over West Virginia

Fiesta Bowl: Alabama over Oregon

Orange Bowl: Florida State over Wisconsin

BCS National Championship: Oklahoma vs. Boise State

In 2007, Boise State and Oklahoma played in the Fiesta Bowl in a classic game, remembered for a hook-and-ladder play for a touchdown late in the 4th quarter, a Statue of Liberty play for a game winning 2-point conversion, and a marriage proposal. It’s also remembered as Bob Stoops’ most embarrassing loss at Oklahoma. That year’s Sooners team was stacked. Adrian Peterson in the backfield. Malcolm Kelly, Manny Johnson, and Juaqin Iglesias on the outside (all excellent college receivers). Trent Williams on the offensive line, Gerald McCoy at DT, Jermaine Gresham at tight end, etc, etc. Even their kicker, Garrett Hartley, has made a name for himself in the NFL winning a Super Bowl with the Saints. Boise came into that game with future NFL stars, um, Jared Zabransky? Ian Johnson? Jerard Raab?

For one night, the little school, with the blue field, in a small city in the Northwest was better than the blue blood, Midwestern, powerhouse. And it helped Boise State get itself back to respected status following their Georgia debacle two years earlier.

As for 2011 (or 2012 as it were), the question has to be asked, “What are the biggest obstacles to these two teams being undefeated?” For Oklahoma, it’s undoubtedly the game in Tallahassee against Florida State. Of course, they’ll need to win games against Oklahoma State and Texas A&M, but the Seminoles pose the biggest schematic challenge for Oklahoma. For the Broncos, avenging the loss to Georgia, beating a motivated TCU team, and never becoming complacent (see: Reno, Nevada. November 26, 2010) will be their biggest challenges.

In the game, I’ll take the Broncos again. Scoff as the power conferences will, Boise State is the best all around team in the country. In 2007, people chalked up their victory to “gimmicks and tricks.” This time they won’t do it with “gimmicks and tricks.” They’ll beat the Sooners like they beat Virginia Tech last year. They’ll outplay them. Kellen Moore will outplay Landry Jones. The defense will swarm and attack. And Chris Peterson will scheme better than Bob Stoops (again). If it happens, it’ll be a landmark moment in college football and a bright spot on what has been a pretty bad stretch of publicity for the sport. Make that a bright, blue spot.

Heisman

The race for the Heisman will be a race for second place. I fully expect, as you can tell, Andrew Luck to live up to the hype and to exceed last year’s success.

1. Andrew Luck (QB/Stanford)

2. Kellen Moore (QB/Boise State)

3. Trent Richardson (RB/Alabama)

4. Landry Jones (QB/Oklahoma)

5. Marcus Lattimore (RB/South Carolina)

Wrap-Up

Forget the Holidays. This is the most wonderful time of the year. September 3rd can’t come soon enough.

I Appreciate Minor League Baseball on a Much Deeper Level Than You

(Title is an Onion article. Special prize (nothing) goes to the person who guesses first what the subject of that article was)



I love minor league baseball. In fact, I may love minor league baseball more than I love Major League baseball. I love watching undeveloped (and underdeveloped) young players grow. I like analyzing pitcher’s arm actions and guessing who’s going to need Tommy John surgery some day. I particularly enjoy watching young hitters who possess some element of patience at the plate. Few things in baseball drive me more crazy than hitters swinging at first pitches and beginning their at bats in an 0-1 hole. I like watching young players draw walks. Nothing bad can come from a walk. I used to not be of this school of thought, but sometimes a walk is even better than a single. You can’t get thrown out at second trying to leg out a walk. You aren’t going to have other baserunners get thrown out running for home. In fact, if a team were able to just walk in each at bat, never putting ball in play or striking out, that team would never lose. Ever. In fact, their first game would never end. I cannot preach patience enough.

Wednesday, I went to a minor league baseball game in Hagerstown, Maryland to see Washington Nationals phenom Stephen Strasburg as he rehabs following Tommy John Surgery last September. What I saw, including a rough 1.2 IP from Strasburg, was incredibly frustrating. Hitters swinging early in counts. Pitchers locating fastballs up in the zone. Terrible coaching on the basepaths (really, on a 50-50 ball in the OF, it’s okay to send the runner from second when you’re up 8-5 in the third inning). But more than what I saw, it was what I heard that left me frustrated.
Yes, the biggest problem with minor league baseball is the “fans.” I consider myself to be a bit of a baseball fan. Accordingly, I feel as though those who consider themselves fans of a game should know at least a little bit about what they’re watching. And yet, I never get that feeling at minor league games. People seem to be there for the beer, as though they couldn’t get a 12 pack of Yuengling and sit on their decks for the same price as a ticket and one beer. People also seem to be there to act boorish, which is troublesome for a number of reasons.
About a month ago, I dragged Amanda (literally, it was very disturbing) to Bowie, Maryland to see the Harrisburg Senators and the Bowie Baysox, but mainly to see Bryce Harper, the Nationals top organizational prospect and, depending on who you ask, baseball’s top prospect. What I encountered at this game was a handful of adults (men and women in their 30s and older) who found it entirely necessary to yell, berate, and mock an 18 year old kid. Screams of “You’re worthless!” and “You suck!” rained down on Harper. Boos followed him wherever he went and with whatever he did. People have issues with Harper’s seeming lack of maturity. I find it ironic that those same people find it mature to taunt someone who is barely old enough to buy a lottery ticket. I found myself wondering aloud what one particular “fan” would tell his coworkers the next day. “Aw, dudez, you should have seen how I was yelling at that 18 year old kid. Sure he possesses more talent than all of us combined. Sure he’s only 18. Sure I paid to see him play. But man, he could totally hear me when I told him he should give his money back to the Nationals after he grounded out. It was awesome!” High fives and fist pounds abound. Harper went 2-4 with 2 doubles in the game. I doubt that the grown ups who heckled him did much better that day at their jobs.
Wednesday night, I got to experience more of this. In abundance in fact. Most of the fan hatred was directed towards “Old Blue.” Umpires, especially in A-ball, are by and large very inconsistent, at best. And sometimes even I find myself blurting out “how was that a strike?” or “Where’d that miss?” loud enough for the umpire to hear me. What I cannot stand, however, is the constant chirping on every pitch from fans. And not from children. Grown men. Very grown men. Wednesday night there was a group of senior citizens heckling the home plate umpire (challenging his manhood…classy!) and players in both organizations.
You’ll notice that I didn’t refer to the Hagerstown Suns or the Lexington Legends as “teams.” This is because, as far as I’m concerned, they are not. They are members of an organization. In this case, the Washington Nationals and the Houston Astros. Fans at minor league games, though, do not seem to understand that. They get angry when a pitcher comes out of a game early because he’s on a pitch count. They get angry when guys aren’t stealing bases or railroading the opposing catcher. And in turn, they make me angry. They make me angry because I go to watch development. I go to see how far along pitchers are in developing anything outside of a fastball/slider. I go to watch hitters learn how to hit. I go to watch and enjoy baseball in a very organic way. I do not go to minor league baseball games to listen to uninformed analysis, listen to drunk people, watch drunk people, and witness unfair treatment of kids, in front of younger kids. The behavior of some adults at minor league baseball games embarrasses me and makes me wonder what fandom will be like when I’m 20 years older.
When I was young, my grandfather took me to a Pawtucket Red Sox game every couple of weeks. This happened for years. He was a shining example of behavior for me. He cheered for the team he was rooting for (the PawSox), never booed anyone, cheered when the opposing team made a good play, yielded to pedestrians in the parking lot, threw out his food containers, wore his seat belt, and drove home safely. He helped instill a love of baseball in me. My grandfather was never the stat head that I am. He never followed every team in the game, like I do, carving out time in his daily schedule to watch the Houston Astros because Jordan Lyles (or his Jordan Lyles equivalent) was pitching. He just really enjoyed baseball. Enjoyed the atmosphere. Enjoyed the effort. Enjoyed the game. And at the base level of my love of baseball is that same feeling of enjoyment. If you take away the BABIP, the OPS +, and the FIPs, you get an appreciation of the game. My grandfather taught me this, whether it was his intention or not. I hope there are some parents and grandparents out there who can do the same for today’s young Jasons.

Soccer!!!!!

Today might not seem like it, but it’s actually a pretty huge day in the history of American soccer. At least potentially.

First, NBC has reached a 3-year deal to televise 45 MLS and 4 US Men’s National Team (USMNT) games. As part of the deal, NBC itself will air a few regular season and playoff games. The bulk of coverage though will be seen on the Versus network (which is being re-branded in January 2012 and will become the NBC Sports Network). This is big news for the MLS. Previously, their games appeared on the Fox Soccer Channel. And while people criticize the NHL’s presence on Versus, I can tell you that more people know where Versus is on their dial than FSC. And I can also tell you that Versus’ sports broadcasts are as good or better than ESPN’s in many cases. And NBC and Versus will promote MLS in a way that ESPN does not.
Some of you may be confused. You may think, “No, Jason, the MLS disbanded years ago.” While that may seem true, it is in fact inaccurate. In fact, MLS is looking at some kind of resurgence (can you have a resurgence without a surgence?”) in 2011. MLS has done a lot of things poorly in their 15 years of active play. Remember the Tampa Bay Mutiny? The Miami Fusion? If there’s one thing MLS has done, it’s expand perhaps too much. It’s also done itself a disservice by not marketing itself very well. Having your games buried on ESPN2 on Friday nights isn’t going to do much good. But there’s lot of good for MLS. Of the 19 teams in the league beginning with First Kick 2012, only 4 will be playing in non-soccer specific stadiums. And each of those teams are on solid footing in the league (DC United, New England Revolution, Seattle Sounders, and Houston Dynamo). Perhaps the best thing that MLS has done is begin to infiltrate markets not generally regarded as soccer hotbeds, but which are proving to be crazy for their teams: namely Portland, Oregon and Seattle, Washington. Earlier this season, the Portland Timbers hosted the Seattle Sounders in front of a sold out crowd at Jeld-Wen Field. The game was broadcast on ESPN following the Women’s World Cup Final. It drew good ratings and has been regarded as a turning point in MLS’ history. For once, the league had a storyline: Two teams had a rivalry.
There are two things that MLS needs to survive and thrive: exposure and more talent. It’s worth noting that I think the quality of soccer in MLS is vastly inferior to the other international leagues broadcast here in the States. It’s very likely that the former need won’t come until the latter does. Depending on the financial details of today’s deal (undisclosed at this point) and the league’s revenue sharing agreements for its clubs, this NBC agreement could help bring that talent to the states. And I’m sure that’s something that NBC is banking on. More money means more reasons for the world’s best players to come to the US. More rivalries like the one in the Pacific Northwest mean more general interest from the less than average soccer fan, which means higher ratings, which means greater advertising dollars, which means, well, it means more reasons for the world’s talented players to choose American club teams. The results of this NBC deal will not take hold fully for a few years. But Major League Soccer is on the right path. Following their current trend MLS can be more than sustainable within the next 5-7 years. It could be a sports staple in this country. The potential is all there. They just need a little assistance from the USMNT.
Speaking of which, what about the other half of what makes today a potentially monumental day for American soccer? Well, tonight, the USMNT has a friendly (aka an exhibition match) against their greatest rival: Meixco. A little less than two months ago, the United States nearly beat Mexico in front of an unfriendly crowd on home soil in the CONCACAF (don’t ask what that stands for) Gold Cup Final. A win would have been a pretty big deal. Instead, the US blew a 2 goal lead to Mexico and lost its match 4-2 in embarrassing fashion. A few weeks ago, US Soccer announced that coach Bob Bradley was being relieved of his duties and the following day hired former German National Team player and coach Jurgen Klinsmann to command their ship. The USMNT, under Bradley, may have accomplished more than at any other point in its history. But it was very clear that Bradley had maxed out as coach what his team was going to produce. And his style wasn’t truly conducive to long term success. In soccer, you’re not going to be successful by not being particularly good at anything. The USMNT wasn’t particularly strong defensively and was, at best, uninteresting offensively. And bad, at worst.
Klinsmann has promised to bring more excitement to American soccer, which is like Alaska saying it could afford to bring in more palm trees. He promises to not be so focused on the ridiculous notion of playing white soccer players as a marketing gimmick. Klinsmann will play the players who fulfill FIFA’s requirements for national eligibility. It doesn’t matter what they look like, what language they speak, or how you say their last name. Gone are the days of Stuart Holden and Jonathan Bornstein getting playing time because there’s some sort of notion that soccer will be successful in the US if someone in Iowa can turn on their TV and say, “Aw, he looks like a nice boy.” If you’re talented, you’ll play. If you can score, you’ll play. If you can pass, you’ll play. It’s the way things should have been before.
Klinsmann hasn’t had a whole deal of time to implement his system into US Soccer. Tonight is just a very early first step in the process. But make no mistake about it, his arrival is a change. And in this instance, change is good. And this is change I can believe in. I don’t expect the US to avenge their Gold Cup loss to Mexico tonight in Philadelphia with a resounding 4-0 victory. But I do hope to see some glimmers of hope, of life, and of inventiveness on the pitch at Lincoln Financial Field tonight. And I expect to see development of the system in the coming year, as we head towards World Cup 2014 qualifying.
We might not realize it today or tomorrow morning, but there may be a day, years down the line, when some soccer scribe looks back on August 10, 2011 and puts into better context than I can what today could mean to American soccer. The sport is not going away. It only continues to gain in popularity on the world’s scale. There will come a day when soccer is the third sport in America, behind American football and baseball. As our nation’s Hispanic population increases, soccer will become more popular. That will lead to higher TV ratings. That will lead to increased ad dollars. That will lead to bigger TV contracts. That will lead to more money for teams to spend on players. That will lead to the world’s best players wanting to spend their prime making bank in cities like Los Angeles, Houston, and Seattle. And finally, that will lead to a higher quality of club level play. The road is clear for soccer’s success in this country. The road trip starts today.

Baseball at the 55.556% Mark

I wonder occasionally if I would blog more often if I were jobless again. For those of you who don’t know, this blog was started back in January 2008 as a means for me to fill the hours of my day that weren’t spent applying for jobs, focusing on perhaps the (non-human) thing I love the most: sports. As time has moved, this space has become like one of those old toys in Toy Story 3. It sits in its toolbar. Occasionally I’ll fire it up and read an old post. But I rarely find myself with the time to compose a piece like my last post (an NFL mock draft). Even something without a ton of research in it takes at least an hour to craft. If I wanted to put together short pieces on sports, I’d call it Twitter, which I already do (@midatlanticbias).

Today though, as baseball began its unofficial and mathematically incorrect second half, I wanted to take a look at the storylines for each team (yes, all 30) as we head into late July, August, and on.

Owning MLB.TV and having a very caring, thoughtful, and understanding domestic partner (like a wife without the tax break) affords me the opportunity, or the joy, of being able to see any team play whenever I want. For instance, I started off my evening with the Blue Jays/Yankees game. At 8, with the Jays up 8-1, I moved to the Twins/Royals game, just as a time-filler before my game of the night, the Brewers/Rockies game at 8:30. On nights like this when Amanda is out socializing, I like to fill my home with the sounds of bats on balls and ex-players who do not understand a lick about the game they played saying things like, “Jeff Francouer is a real good ballplayer,” while I yell about the fact that he hasn’t had a single-season WAR above 1.0 since 2007. And you know, as annoyed as I get, I love it. Because it’s baseball.

Part of being able to see any team play whenever I want means that I’ve actually seen every team play at least once this season. Yes, I’ve watched the Astros and Padres. And I’d like to think I know a thing or two. So here’s the biggest storyline, or question, by my count, for each team in the final 44.54% of the season.

Arizona Diamondbacks: Can they keep this up?
They won’t all be that vague, but for the Diamondbacks, that’s the question. Most people had them in the cellar in the NL West. I had them finishing second. I really like Daniel Hudson and Ian Kennedy in their rotation. In the lineup, it’s really hard to argue against the still only 22 year old Justin Upton. His .293/.375/.506 split is right where you’d expect. He’s stealing more bases this year and scoring more runs (a product of hitters behind him performing better than they have previously). The question for Arizona is whether or not one of their other starters or someone other than Upton and Chris Young can overperform in the second half. There’s no one in the system who can be their version of Buster Posey, though, so maintaining their first half success might come harder than it did for the 2010 Giants.

Atlanta Braves: Can they catch Philadelphia?
I picked the Braves to win the World Series because of their balance. But they need another bat in their outfield. Colby Rasmus or Hunter Pence could be the game changer for Atlanta. They’d need to likely give up a guy like Julio Teheran, Mike Minor, or Brandon Beachy to acquire either, but doing so very well could propel them beyond the Phillies. So should they sacrifice a promising pitching future for a chance at success this year? In my opinion, yes. I would love to see Atlanta send Teheran and a second-tier prospect to St. Louis for the disgruntled Rasmus. And I think if they did so, they might prove my prognostication correct. Because that bullpen is stellar.

Baltimore Orioles: What happened to their young pitching?
The Orioles fell off the map right around the time Zach Britton and Brian Matusz did. Both of those guys are the Orioles future. It’ll be interesting to see what they do with Britton, Matusz, and (the guy I really, almost irrationally, like, Jake Arrieta. They’ve got to protect the future and ride yet another wave of failure in Charm City. The future is bright enough, so long as they can get those three guys to right the ship.

Boston Red Sox: Can the pitching stay healthy enough?
With Lester and Buchholz on the DL and Josh Beckett having been relatively unseen for the past 3 weeks, combined with Daisuke’s short season, the Red Sox rotation is a mess right now. Past Beckett, you’ve got John Lackey, Tim Wakefield, Andrew Miller, and Kyle Weiland right now. The offense has been great, but should they go through a cold spell, the Red Sox will drop quickly behind the Yankees. They need Lester and Buchholz back quickly.

Chicago White Sox: What is wrong with them?
With that rotation, bullpen, and lineup they have, on paper, you would think they would be a little bit better than the Cleveland Indians. But baseball, like life, is not played on paper. And this team has underachieved mightily. Sports Illustrated’s Joe Posnanski (who, if you’ve never read him before and are reading this now, you’d be wise to close this tab and open up one for him) wrote a few weeks ago that Adam Dunn is the most boring player in the history of baseball. And, as Pos wrote, the numbers are there. Dunn is striking out like, well, Adam Dunn, but he’s not walking as much, and his power numbers totally missing. The Sox have gotten great performances out of Carlos Quentin and Paul Konerko, but not much else. They need a guy like John Danks in the rotation and Dunn in the lineup to start performing for them to have a chance at catching Detroit.

Chicago Cubs: Why watch them?
Baseball people (the ones I don’t like) talk about Starlin Castro like he’s a young Alex Rodriguez. Well, I’ve watched. He’s not. He may be the game’s worst defensive shortstop. He gets on-base at a robust clip of 33% of the time. Oh, and the .763 OPS isn’t fooling me. Look, I know he’s only 21. Five years from now, he may be an elite player (not a shortstop though). Frankly, I don’t see it. And so, why watch the Cubs? Well, there’s nothing wrong with day games.

Cincinnati Reds: Can anyone pitch?
MLB.TV grants you three “favorite teams” to always have at the top of your game schedule. Mine are the Washington Nationals (which is stupid because I get their games on local TV, but I digress), the San Francisco Giants (because I love watching their pitchers, love AT&T Park, love late night baseball, and really, really love their broadcasters Duane Kuiper and Mike Krukow), and the Cincinnati Reds. Now, the Reds are not my “third favorite baseball team.” However, they might be my third favorite to watch. Good broadcasting (Thom Brennaman) and one of the game’s best offenses. I could watch Joey Votto work a count for hours. Jay Bruce’s power is great. Brandon Phillips is a great table setter. And Drew Stubbs, um, strikes out a ton. The Reds should be in first in the NL Central, but aren’t because their starting pitching has been atrocious. Edinson Volquez has regressed more than any other pitcher in baseball, based on his talent level, Johnny Cueto is pitching well, but is fragile, Mike Leake is what he is, Homer Bailey, and their fifth starter? Dontrelle Willis. This is a team that needs Cueto to stay 100% and one, or both, or Leake and Volquez to pitch above their heads. So far, as much as I’ve watched the Reds, and will continue to, I don’t see it.

Cleveland Indians: Can they keep it up?
No. Next.

Colorado Rockies: What’s up with Ubaldo Jimenez?
Well, here’s the thing. Ubaldo Jimenez is what he is. Every year, there seems to be a pitcher who shatters their own ceiling in the first two months and everyone talks about Sandy Koufax. Brad Penny a few years ago. Jimenez last year. Jered Weaver this year. All three of those guys are or were, in Penny’s case, good to very good pitchers. But none are truly Cy Young-caliber guys (I’m not a big Weaver fan. I know others will call me crazy, but he gives up too many home runs, and I’m not sure that his low number in half number one can hold up). People keep asking about Jimenez, “When’s he going to get back to where he was?” But really, other than the W-L record, how far off is he? He’s always walked a ton of guys. His HR/9 totals are higher this year, but not too dramatically. He’s a good to very good pitcher. He can have no-hit stuff, obviously. But he’s not an ace. And until Colorado finds one, they’re not going to get it done.

Detroit Tigers: Who will step up behind Verlander and Scherzer?
The lineup is there. The bullpen is shaky, but serviceable, especially in the AL Central. The starting pitching though, outside of the AL Cy Young favorite Verlander and the erratic but talented Scherzer, is bad. Like, cannot win a playoff series bad. Tiger fans keep waiting for something from Rick Porcello (keep waiting). And if you think Brad Penny is the answer, good luck. In a bad division, they could win a title. In a very good league, they won’t get out of the Wild Card round.

Florida Marlins: Will Josh Johnson come back?
A disappointing year for the Marlins, who I thought would be a good 3rd place team and are instead a bad 5th place team. The injury to Josh Johnson combined with Hanley Ramirez’s underachievement along with their managerial fiasco have buried them. And so the fans of the soon-to-be Miami Marlins have to wonder whether or not they’ll see their ace again this season and whether or not they should. I say no (and think they should sell on him, as highly as possible, now), but opening a new stadium next season, you would think the Marlins would like to have some sort of momentum for 2012. It could be an interesting, way below the radar story line.

Houston Astros: Where will Hunter Pence be on August 1?
This is perhaps the most fascinating storyline and it should play out in the next 12 days. Pence is one of the best players in baseball that no one has ever actually seen play. He can hit to all fields. He plays good defense. He can run. He hits for power. He could be an absolute game changer for one contender. The list of destinations are many for Pence. Atlanta, San Francisco, and Philadelphia make the most sense. On any of the three, he would catapult them into a favorite role, in my opinion. And he’d return a small bounty to a cupboard in Houston that is absolutely bare. When you’re the worst team in baseball, you really don’t want to have a bottom 5 minor league system. But the Astros do. Each of those three teams possess a certain degree of young pitching talent (a lot for the first two and some for the latter) that could really help Houston. But if I had to make a gut call, I’d say the Astros senselessly hang onto Pence. Which would anger and bore me endlessly. Though at least I’d have a reason to watch the Astros.

Kansas City Royals: How good can Eric Hosmer be?
I watched a Royals game a few weeks after the Hosmer call-up and listened to the announcers talk endlessly about their love of Hosmer. And it’s easy to love him. He plays good first base and has a terrific bat. Not to mention, he’s a pretty marketable star. The problem for young Hosmer is that there’s no one else worth watching right now on that team. Mike Moustakas, another recent callup and former top organizational prospect, has regressed over the course of his minor league career, and will need to switch positions before long. And while Alex Gordon has had a Renaissance, he’s still just Alex Gordon. It’ll be hard to expect much from Hosmer in the second half, because he’s such a young hitter with so little around him. But in the future, he’ll be the next Mark Teixiera.

Los Angeles Angels: Mike Trout?
Mike Trout.

Los Angeles Dodgers: Is there any storyline that doesn’t involve the words “Frank” or “McCourt” or “Bankruptcy?”
No. There isn’t. And it’s too bad for Andre Ethier, Clayton Kershaw, and Matt Kemp.

Milwaukee Brewers: Is there any reason to believe they’re not this good?
No, in fact, they’re better. Zack Greinke has not been very good. His strikeout numbers are off the charts. He’s not walking anyone. But he’s simply giving up too many hits and subsequently runs. He should be able to fix that. Shaun Marcum has faded a bit, but if he can step it back up, combined with Yovanni Gallardo, the Brewers could rival the Giants for second best 1-2-3. Oh, and they also have a 3-4-5 in the batting order of Braun, Fielder, and Hart. And that’s not bad. Oh, and they just added one of the best closers of the last decade to their bullpen.

Minnesota Twins: Can they do what they’ve done alot with Ron Gardenhire?
That thing that they’ve done is win in the second half. And I think the answer is yes, if for no other reason than the division they play in. You’d have to expect Joe Mauer to pick it up. And soon they’ll be getting back Jason Kubel, Denard Span, and Justin Morneau. Don’t be too surprised if the Twins win the AL Central.

New York Mets: Will Jose Reyes get traded?
No. And neither will Carlos Beltran. And both of those non-moves, especially the latter, would be mistakes. Reyes’ value will never be higher than it is now. And I don’t think Beltran’s will be either. On a very bad baseball team with very little organizational pitching, those two guys are playing great baseball. Reyes is a potential MVP. He could return two top flight pitchers and one or two mid-to-high tier prospects. And that’s exactly what the Mets need.

New York Yankees: Can they tread water while A-Rod recovers from surgery?
Yes, but I don’t think it will be easy. In case you’ve never watched baseball before, Eduardo Nunez is no A-Rod. His defense leaves even more to be desired than A-Rod’s. And his bat, well, that’s not worth talking about. The thing for the Yankees remains their starting pitching depth. For Boston, the issue is health with their pitching. For New York, it just wasn’t good to begin with. CC is great. Phillip Hughes is fine. So is AJ Burnett. But those guys are both 3-4 starters. And after them, there’s nothing. So the Yankees need offensive production. Without it, they could be in a bit of trouble.

Oakland Athletics: When does Moneyball come out?
Seriously, if you’re looking for me to come up with some grand story line for the Oakland A’s, I’ve got nothing for you. Their pitching is enjoyable to watch. I like Trevor Cahill a lot. Gio Gonzalez is fine. Their offense is putrid, though. And their best pitcher, Brett Anderson, just found himself under the knife receiving Tommy John surgery. As if he hadn’t missed enough time over the past few years. Your best bet for the Oakland A’s is following pitcher Brandon McCarthy on twitter at @B__McCarthy. And yes, that’s two underscores.

Philadelphia Phillies: Do they even need Roy Oswalt?
Need? No. Would it be nice to have him around in October? Certainly. I think he’ll be there. I’d imagine they’re being extra careful with him because, well, why not? They’re great. Their top 3 starting pitchers are so far ahead of whatever 1-2-3 is the second best in baseball, you may as well be comparing the 1927 New York Yankees lineup to the 2011 Oakland Athletics lineup. If Halladay isn’t your Cy Young winner, it’s Hamels. And if Hamels isn’t, well, Cliff Lee is capable of near perfection every single time he pitches. The Phillies will be next to impossible to beat in a playoff series. The only question is whether they’ll get there. And I think even if Atlanta wins the East, Philly will win the wild card. And if Oswalt is healthy then, they won’t be stopped.

Pittsburgh Pirates: Can they keep this up?
Of course not. Don’t be stupid. But, they’re definitely on the up. Whereas last year, the Padres played above their heads all year long, and this year, the Indians are, I don’t see Pittsburgh dropping off next year like San Diego did this year and Cleveland assuredly will next year. The Pirates rotation is not what an expert would call “good.” But it’s serviceable. Their lineup has some bright spots (see the outstanding Andrew McCutchen) but they’re not the Cincinnati Reds. And their bullpen is good, but bullpens don’t win games, they lose them. Next year, the Pirates will have developed further. There’s not a ton of high system talent right now, but that will come down the line with Jameson Taillon, Starling Marte, Gerritt Cole and others. Until then, I hope the Pirates fans keep going to games and keep enjoying this team before a ticket to beautiful PNC is a difficult buy.

San Diego Padres: Much like Hunter Pence, where will Heath Bell be pitching on August 1?
The Padres will trade Bell. I don’t think that Bell is quite as good as all of his success would have you believe. His fastball is very good. But that’s about it. He’s hittable. I’d guess he’ll wind up in Texas or Detroit.

San Francisco Giants: Can they win the World Series without Buster Posey?
As good as their pitching is, their lineup is just as bad without Posey. As much as Atlanta needs a guy like Rasmus or Pence, San Francisco needs a Pence or Carlos Beltran. They need someone to produce something in that lineup. Pence would be great in San Francisco. His power would drop, but he’d become a doubles machine, while playing good defensive outfield. Put it this way, if the Giants don’t make a major offensive move, they might win the NL West. But that’s the only banner they’ll hang for 2011.

Seattle Mariners: Is Michael Pineda going to decline in the second half?
Probably. But you’d still have to be impressed with him. I know I have. His starts have become near must-watches for me. I love his effortlessness. Love his fastball. Love that he has a near-1.00 WHIP. And I especially love that he’s only 22. So if he starts giving up more long balls and walking a guy or two more, don’t fret M’s fans. For his first full season in the Major Leagues he’s been a huge success. Consider the Mariners the AL version of the Pirates. With Felix Hernandez.

St. Louis Cardinals: How in the world are they going to win the Central?
They’re not, overzealous Cardinals fans. The pitching isn’t any good. The bullpen isn’t either. Yes, they have Pujols, Holliday, and the (sure to slump) Berkman in the lineup, but they’re way behind Milwaukee in talent. And I just really dislike Tony LaRussa. A lot.

Tampa Bay Rays: Can they catch the Yankees and Red Sox?
Well, the pitching is probably good enough to get them there. James Shields has been nothing short of a revelation this year, pitching like Jack Morris. David Price is still David Price. Jeff Niemann has pitched well of late. The offense, though, isn’t good enough. Ten years from now, someone will say, “Former All-star Matt Joyce has announced his retirement….” and I’ll think, “MATT JOYCE WAS AN ALL-STAR???!!!” Snark aside, if you’re looking for Matt Joyce to carry your offense, you may as well be the Oakland Athletics (no, seriously, when does Moneyball come out?). I long for the day that Andrew Friedman gives up on BJ Upton. In short, there’s just not a lot of good stuff in that Tampa lineup. They’re kind of boring. And boring usually means “not productive.” Certainly not productive enough to win the AL East.

Texas Rangers: Is that starting rotation really good enough to win a pennant?
No, but that offense certainly is. The Rangers won the AL pennant last year. This year’s offense is better. The addition of Adrian Beltre has improved their lineup from very good to very gooder. If Ian Kinsler could figure out how to hit on the road, they’d probably stretch their small, one game lead over the Angels. I don’t think LA is a threat. So long as guys like Colby Lewis and Matt Harrison keep on doing whatever it is that they’re doing.

Toronto Blue Jays: How good could they be with Roy Halladay?
I think they could be the favorite in the AL East. I realize that one pitcher does not completely change a team, but this team desperately needs a rock at the top of the rotation. Ricky Romero is a very good number 2 starter who is their ace. Beyond Romero, there’s not a lot of intimidating stuff. But their lineup is great, anchored by the AL MVP, Jose Bautista, who is proving every one of his critics wrong, all in the face of baseless and, frankly, stupid steroid accusations. How dare he be good? Outside of Bautista, they’ve got speed in Rajai Davis, more power in Adam Lind, a hopefully resurgent Travis Snider, and a good young catcher in J.P. Arencibia. Toronto is not far off the Texas Rangers track. That’s likely not a World Series winning track, but in most divisions, it’s a contending track. And that makes them a fun watch (and a tough out) in the second half of this season.

Washington Nationals: JAYSON %#@&!$^ WERTH????!!!!!!
Okay, that’s not quite a question or a storyline, but lately, if I see him or hear his name, that’s what I want to scream. It would be easier to watch his floundering if he didn’t make $18 million per season. It would be easier to watch if it looked like he gave a darn. It would be easier to watch if he looked like he had taken a shower, for God’s sake. But with every 0-4 game, with 2 foul outs and 5 runners left on base, I think about all the things a team can do with $18 million. Like draft and sign guys way over slot. Like take risks on high upside/low-mid cost free agents. Like lowering ticket prices. Like paying people to sit in those empty $300 seats behind home plate. Like signing Jordan Zimmermann to a long-term extension. And on and on. I hated the Werth signing the moment I saw it. Anyone who had an objective eye and knew a good deal about baseball knew to look past the production in 2010 in Philadelphia. Mike Rizzo didn’t pass that test. There’s plenty for me to be excited about: Bryce Harper, Stephen Strasburg, J-Zimm, Ryan Zimmerman, Danny Espinosa, the out-of-nowhere rise of Brad Peacock, AJ Cole’s great work in A-ball, the 2011 draft, the idea that maybe, just maybe, Matt Purke isn’t totally damaged goods. No team in Major League baseball has a brighter long-term future than the Nats. But I keep going back to the Werth signing. And I look at Michael Morse. And I think, oh no. This can’t happen again, right?

Playoff Predictions:

AL Winners:
East: Red Sox
Central: White Sox
West: Rangers
Wild Card: Yankees

NL Winners:
East: Phillies
Central: Brewers
West: Giants
Wild Card: Braves

World Series: Phillies over Red Sox
(But it could still be my preseason Braves over White Sox prediction, right?)

2011 NFL Mock Draft

I couldn’t let the NFL Draft go by without my third consecutive mock draft. Especially because I never missed a pick in my previous 2 mocks. Okay, that was a lie. But I enjoy doing them, reading them, and seeing how awful my first round ends up being.

Last year, I started off 4-for-4. I then flipped Eric Berry and Russell Okung. So, I was looking good. Then I had the Cleveland Browns taking Jimmy Clausen. Clausen didn’t get drafted by the Browns. Or any other team in Round 1. Then I had Oakland taking Bruce Campbell. Which they did. In Round 4. The rest of the mock wasn’t so atrocious. I nearly hit on Tim Tebow’s slotting when most people had him going in Round 2. And I hit on Jermaine Gresham to Cincinnati. So I’m going to try my hand at it again this year. Without further ado, 2011 Mock Draft Version 1 and Only. A reminder, the selections you see are what I think will happen in terms of player slotting. No trades (though, as a sidebar, no team needs to move up in this draft more than the St. Louis Rams, to take AJ Green or Julio Jones) in this mock. Explanations where needed/wanted.
1. Carolina Panthers- Cam Newton (QB/Auburn)
This would not be my pick if I were running the Panthers. With so much uncertainty in the 2011 NFL season, I’d be hesitant to draft a QB with my first overall pick unless he was a sure thing. Newton is not that. Cam is the most dynamic QB in this draft. And he has the most to work with in terms of skill set. And the highest ceiling. But he also needs a lot of work to succeed in the NFL. I’d take a surer thing on the defensive side of the ball. Marcell Dareus or Von Miller come to mind. Bear in mind, this is not a criticism of Cam. I just don’t know for sure that he’s going to be the best player in this draft.
2. Denver Broncos- Marcell Dareus (DT/Alabama)
A no-brainer for a team that couldn’t sack a potato in 2010. Dareus is a workhorse. And a great addition to an abysmal defense.
3. Buffalo Bills- Blaine Gabbert (QB/Missouri)
Most prognosticators talk about how the Bills should draft a QB, but that they never will do the right thing. But what if they do? I think the Bills take Gabbert as the heir apparent to Jim Kelly (15 years later). It makes sense.
4. Cincinnati Bengals- AJ Green (WR/Georgia)
I prefer Julio Jones. But I really prefer being right in my mock draft. I think Cincinnati goes offense, even with the surest thing in this draft (in my opinion), Von Miller, still on the board.
5. Arizona Cardinals- Patrick Peterson (CB/LSU)
Another landing spot for Miller, but Peterson fills an immediate, glaring need.
6. Cleveland Browns- Von Miller (LB/Texas A&M)
It’s not necessarily a huge need for the Browns, but a great value pick of a guy who could go as high as #2. Miller is a high character guy with an obscene motor.
7. San Francisco 49ers- Prince Amukamara (CB/Nebraska)
The 49ers would love to see Peterson available here, but they should be happy with the Prince. Amukamara is not just a great Corner (though he may convert to Safety some day) but the best character guy in this draft. And who can doubt someone with the first name “Prince?”
8. Tennessee Titans- Robert Quinn (DE/North Carolina)
Yes, they took another DE last year in the first round (Derrick Morgan, who missed most of the 2010 season with a torn ACL). Yes, they could also go with a Quarterback (Jake Locker), Wide Receiver (Julio Jones), Offensive Tackle (Any of 4), or Defensive Tackle (Nick Fairley). Yes, they are not very good.
9. Dallas Cowboys- Tyron Smith (OT/USC)
Did you know that the Cowboys have never taken an Offensive Tackle in the first round under Jerry Jones? Well, that should change this year if they want to compete for a playoff spot in 2011. Smith is regarded as the best of a pool of good, but not great OT candidates.
10. Washington Redskins- Julio Jones (WR/Alabama)
Jones is the second coming of Hines Ward and would fill a glaring need for the Redskins. He’s a steal here in my opinion as I’d rank him as a top 5 prospect in this draft.
11. Houston Texans- Jimmy Smith (CB/Colorado)
A huge reach. This year’s Tyson Alualu. Houston is a team that needs a CB more than anyone else in this draft. If they can’t move up to draft Peterson or Amukamara, I see them reaching for the next best thing. Smith is arguably as talented a CB as Peterson or Prince, but regarded as being a diva and a distraction. The talent is good enough that Houston should take the gamble. Because their corners were awful last year. Of course, if he doesn’t get drafted here, don’t be surprised if he falls into Round 2.
12. Minnesota Vikings- Gabe Carimi (OT/Wisconsin)
Quarterback is a possibility for the Vikings, but they need to get younger on the offensive line. And really, there’s no Quarterback here who is truly worth taking this high and handing over the keys to the car to.
13. Detroit Lions- Cameron Jordan (DE/California)
Two months ago, Da’Quan Bowers was not only the top DE prospect, but the draft’s top prospect. Now, injury concerns have the Lions, in my opinion, making the smart move and taking the best available, healthy DE.
14. St. Louis Rams- Nick Fairley (DT/Auburn)
If he’s available here, and I do think he falls out of the top 10, St. Louis has a steal on their hands. The Rams are in the toughest spot at 14. They need a top flight WR, but Green and Jones will be gone by pick 14. St. Louis needs to move up to provide Sam Bradford a 12 year weapon on the outside.
15. Miami Dolphins- Nate Solder (OT/Colorado)
Of course, Jake Locker is an option. But the Dolphins need someone to flank the right side of their line. The enormous 6’8″ Solder has the potential to be the right side’s Jake Long.
16. Jacksonville Jaguars- Ryan Kerrigan (DE/Purdue)
The story here to me is the continued plummet of Da’Quan Bowers. I expect this to be a Defensive End and Kerrigan is the next best healthy DE. At some point though, Bowers’ huge potential will be too much for these teams to pass up.
17. New England Patriots- J.J. Watt (DE/Wisconsin)
I’ve seen the Patriots taking J.J. Watt in nearly every mock draft. That usually means that New England will go in the opposite direction. So, really, throw a dart at a board if you’d like. I’ll just go with the guy who seems like the best fit. Though Bowers is an intriguing prospect for New England.
18. San Diego Chargers- Da’Quan Bowers (DE/Clemson)
If any team is going to take a flier on an injured player with a limitless ceiling, it’ll be AJ Smith’s Chargers. And he fills a huge need for the team.
19. New York Giants- Anthony Costonzo (OT/Boston College)
The Giants could not protect Eli Manning last year. With so much invested in Eli and no true anchor at LT, the Giants need to take a LT. Costonzo is the best available.
20. Tampa Bay Buccaneers- Aldon Smith (DE/Missouri)
The Bucs have the youth in the middle of the front 4 with Gerald McCoy and Brian Price. Now they go out and get the youth on the edge, a place they struggled to get production from in 2010, in terms of taking down the QB.
21. Kansas City Chiefs- Phil Taylor (DT/Baylor)
I think the Glenn Dorsey pick was a disaster. With Dorsey now playing DE in their 3-4, Kansas City needs to clean up that mess by taking the talented (though troubled in the past) DT from Baylor.
22. Indianapolis Colts- Akeem Ayers (OLB/UCLA)
The Colts have needs at OT as well, however, there’s later-round depth there. That’s not the case with the LB position. The Colts defense is old, slow, untalented, or all 3. Ayers is the best LB in this draft. That is, assuming Von Miller drops out of the draft before it begins.
23. Philadelphia Eagles- Mike Pouncey (OG/Florida)
I think this might be too low for Pouncey, based entirely on the success of his brother Maurkice across the Keystone State last season.
24. New Orleans Saints- Mark Ingram (RB/Alabama)
A lack of depth in the defensive secondary draft field forces New Orleans to take a look at their biggest offensive weakness. Ingram, if healthy, could be a steal here. That is a huge “if.”
25. Seattle Seahawks- Jake Locker (QB/Washington)
Every year, there’s a pick that makes too much sense. A team without a true QB for their future. Pete Carroll’s connection to Washington coach Steve Sarkisian. Locker playing college ball in Seattle. Locker being from suburban Seattle. It makes too much sense.
26. Baltimore Ravens- Adrian Clayborn (DE/Iowa)
Clayborn without the character issues is a top 15 pick. Why not put him in Charm City with Ray Lewis, Haloti Ngata, Ed Reed, etc.? Let the pros teach the talented kid how to be a pro. I think he can be a big steal this low in Round 1. Does he slip to Round 2? Probably. Should he? Absolutely not. At least not on talent alone.
27. Atlanta Falcons- Randall Cobb (WR/Kentucky)
Cobb is a speedster that Atlanta can pair with Roddy White, giving Matt Ryan a pair of weapons to throw the ball to, rather than just Roddy White and, um, Brian Finneran?
28. New England Patriots- Danny Watkins (OG/Baylor)
Just the usual sexy New England Patriots draft pick, right?
29. Chicago Bears- Christian Ballard (DT/Iowa)
Chicago is a team that needs help on both lines. They’re a likely destination for Danny Watkins, but with him off the board, they move to the D-Line, to a good fit with the hoss Ballard.
30. New York Jets- Marvin Austin (DT/North Carolina)
Austin’s talent has to be intriguing to Rex Ryan. What has to be even more intriguing is that he fills a huge need for the Jets. Austin’s ceiling places him just below Fairley and Dareus. His 2010 season suspension places him at the bottom of the first round, at the earliest.
31. Pittsburgh Steelers- Aaron Williams (CB/Texas)
There are a number of CBs who are all very similar in terms of draft grades. I think Pittsburgh takes the guy who played in the pass happy conference and played well.
32. Green Bay Packers- Cameron Heyward (DE/Ohio State)
There isn’t a whole lot of work the Packers need to do to get better. Because, you know, they won the Super Bowl last year. Heyward is a great fit for the Packers and comes with an NFL pedigree (his father is Ironhead Heyward. Trust me, no one will ever mention that during his career…).
Before we go, I’d like to give you the best players (according to me) at every position (of consequence) who remain on the board.
QB- Andy Dalton- He’s not going to wow anyone with his downfield arm. He will be a great game manager though. Think Trent Dilfer. And that’s not a slight to Dalton.
RB- Mikel Leshoure- A solid all-around back. Leshoure won’t blow you away with his quickness. He won’t blow you away with his physicality. But he should stay healthy and produce.
WR- Jerrell Jernigan- A sound route runner. Does all of the little things well. His biggest knock is his size. I’ve heard this drill before.
TE- Kyle Rudolph- No brainer.
OL- Derek Sherrod- A possible first rounder for a team like Indianapolis or Pittsburgh who need help on the line. A very solid pass blocker.
DL- Muhammad Wilkerson- A high-growth DT who played at lower tier Temple. Room to grow in his smallish frame. Very quick. Could go in Round 1.
LB- Dontay Moch- Another high upside guy. Ran a 4.4 40-yard dash. Could move to safety.
DS- Ras-I Dowling- A big cornerback with a great name. Why not?
Enjoy the Draft folks.

Perk Is Gone…Now What?

Kendrick Perkins was not the heart and soul of the Celtics. For a while there, he was the Achilles heel. His offensive game took forever to develop. He was (and remains) a terrible foul shooter. Even his defense left something to be desired. And it’s hard to overlook the fact that he was a sourpuss. Perk has never committed a foul if you ask him. For me, Perk was famous for having his profanities picked up by broadcast shotgun microphones. If I had a dollar for every time I heard him yell the F-word followed by the N-word, well, I’d be able to re-sign him this offseason. Something the Celtics won’t be able to do.


I had no idea that the trade had happened until about 45 minutes after the deadline. A coworker sent me the story while I was on the telephone with a reporter. I stopped listening to the receiver on my phone for a few seconds, trying to process what I was reading. Perk and Nate traded? For former Celtic legend Jeff Green and Nenad Kristic????!!!! What am I missing???? I couldn’t wait to get off the phone to find out it was just a rumor and never happened. Oops.

The personal backstory for me has to start with the fact that I didn’t love Perk’s game until last season. And as for Nate, well, lets just say I may have let out at least one (well, only one) Perk-like expletive when the C’s acquired him last year. But truth be told, I grew to love Nate. I liked what he brought to the table in Boston. I saw development in his game from UW to the Knicks to the C’s. The Nate who I watched in college had developed into more than just a basketball playing freak of nature. Gone were the constant dumb passes and gone was the total defensive apathy. Nate gave a darn. And I loved that, really.

I’m going to stop setting up the story here and just get to the meat. I think this is an awful deal for Boston and for once, I know I’m not alone. I hear the argument that the 4th quarter lineup is the same now. Really? What if Jeff Green, a streaky shooter since his time at Georgetown, is on fire? Does he get benched? Or do the C’s go small? What position does Green play in Boston? Does he come off the bench? Because if he’s coming off the bench, Doc is doing something wrong. Jeff Green is an NBA starter. Don’t get me wrong, the Celtics got the best player in this deal. But this deal isn’t about who’s best. Jeff Green doesn’t fit the system here. In Oklahoma City, they’re the Western Conference favorite to me. Perk and Nate give them exactly what they needed. A tough, mean, physical force down low and a scoring guard off the bench who can spot Westbrook or move him to the 2. The move gives OKC positive flexibility. Boston has flexibility too. But not the good kind.

I hear the argument that Glen Davis can play center. I think it’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. If you truly expect Glen Davis to start at center in the playoffs and go up against Dwight Howard, Joakim Noah, or heck, Roy Hibbert (likely first round opponent and a much improved team with the OJ Mayo acquisition) in a 7 game series and come out on top, you’re wrong. And I’m not about to go to Vegas and bet on KG’s knees. No thank you. Garnett might be healthier this year than last, but he’s also a year older. And with age comes wiseness. But with age also continues the breakdown of the human body. Same story for the Fragile O’Neal Brothers. If they’re healthy, different story.

The elephant in the room for me is the Chicago Bulls. Last night was the first time the Bulls had Carlos Boozer and Joakim Noah healthy and in the lineup. And yes, they lost to the lowly Raptors. I’m not at all concerned. This team will gel. They’re the best coached team in the East. They play defense. They’re big. And they’re led by, to this point in the season, the NBA’s MVP in Derrick Rose. In a seven game series, I’m concerned about KG/Big Baby vs. Carlos Boozer/Noah. Noah is a rebounding machine. Glen Davis, er, not so much. What happened to the Celtics last year against LA was the Lakers used their size to exploit Boston’s biggest weakness: a lack of rebounding. Today, the Celtics decided to exploit their own weakness.

Look, maybe this move works out for Boston. Maybe Shaq gets healthy and contributes. Maybe KG’s knees hold up for one more run. Maybe I’m underselling Glen Davis’ big-man ability while overselling the Chicago Bulls. Maybe.

I guess I’m just mad. I watched New York get better this week. Chicago got better. Atlanta got better(ish). Miami stayed very good. Orlando made their big deal already. Boston hasn’t made themselves better. Will they with an acquisition of Troy Murphy? Certainly. He fills a huge void. Until then though, I look at a team that was a threat and I see the Miami Heat, New York Knicks, Chicago Bulls, and Orlando Magic feeling a little bit better about their chances this year. This was the end of the line for the Celtics. I knew it. You knew it. There’s no next year. Next year is a long way away. There are no young pieces in Beantown (especially not with the trading away of Semih Erden today) other than the very inconsistent Avery Bradley and Rondo. A nucleus that does not make. Today should have been about adding a veteran to fill the James Posey role without hurting the nucleus. Instead, the nucleus is gone. And in its place? A lot of uncertainty. And uncertainty with age is never a good thing.

Another College Basketball Post (And my Super Bowl Prediction)

Thursday night, I got to bear witness to one of my least favorite announcer moves. It happens when the play-by-play man asks the color commentator a specific question, often yes or no, and the color commentator says, “Well, yes, but also no. And everyone else.”

The specifics: During Thursday night’s Ohio State/Michigan game, the question was posed, “Is Ohio State the best team in America?” The color commentator’s answer? (Paraphrase) “Well, they’re good. And Kansas is good. And you can’t forget about Pittsburgh. And Duke won it last year. So yeah, I could see Ohio State playing in the Final Four.”

This set off a rant by me. Amanda got to bear witness. My biggest complaint was this: How easy is it to answer that question? Are they the best or not? The answer is simple. Yes, they’re the best. They’re undefeated. No one else is. They’re the top ranked team in every poll. They’re as flawless a team as there could be in 2010-11. Why take the easy way out? They’re a Final Four team? Way to go out on a limb.
This is the Troy Aikman rule of color commentary. You’ll see it on Sunday at the Super Bowl. Aikman loves not saying something decisively. Joe Buck will ask, “Troy, what’s your favorite bread?” and Aikman will say, “Well, ya Joe, you’re right, rye bread is delicious. But it’s important to not forget about sourdough, pumpernickel, and 12-grain honey wheat too. I mean, really, rye is one of my 9 favorite types of bread.”
Why this brand of broadcasting irks me so is easy to explain. I like opinions. And I like people who aren’t afraid to express their opinions in an intelligent, fact-supported way. What harm would have been done if last night’s color commentator had said, “You know, guy, I still think Kansas is the best team in the country. Here’s why: (list of opinions supported by facts).” In life, nothing good comes from timidity.
My rant then spawned a sort of brainstorming session for me. Amanda asked me who I thought were the four best teams in college basketball. And I know that I just wrote about college basketball recently. But, I’m all-in with college basketball right now. There’s only one football game left (Pittsburgh wins 27-24 in Super Bowl XLV). Baseball, with any consequence, is two months away. And the NBA and NHL don’t matter until May. So for me, it’s all about college basketball.
I’ll be brief(ish) in my response to Amanda’s question:
Ohio State and Kansas are the two best teams in college basketball and I fully expect them to make it to the Final Four. As I’ve written in this space before, they’re the two most balanced teams offensively and are very deep. (As a sort of side note: Ohio State is so good defensively).
So who joins them? Duke, first. I’m not concerned about the St. John’s loss. Not one bit. A road loss to a good team at the end of January never killed anyone’s chances of winning a national championship. The Devils’ lack of an interior presence hurts them against the Ohio State’s and Kansas’s of the world, but less so against the Memphis’s and Washington’s of the world. I like Duke’s experience and shooting ability. They’re my third team.
And now, the challenge! Our candidates for the fourth slot include everyone. Well, within reason. I don’t foresee Auburn making the Final Four. If I have to pick my five candidates (don’t worry, I’m going to pick one of them), I’ll take: Texas, Pittsburgh, San Diego State, Syracuse, and BYU. Each of those teams has a fatal flaw. Texas’s is coaching. Pittsburgh’s is overall offensive. San Diego State’s is mid-range shooting. Syracuse’s is wild inconsistency. And BYU’s is depth. The question is not, who’s best? It’s, “which of those short-comings is easiest to overcome?”

Coaching is not. Texas is a talented enough team to win a game in Lawrence, KS in January and they’re talented enough to make the Elite 8. But when you reach the Elite 8, it almost always comes down to the best coach making the right call. And if you follow college basketball like I do, you know that Rick Barnes almost never makes the right call. He’s a fabulous recruiter. That’s the nicest thing I can say about him as a coach. Texas is eliminated.

Depth is not. I watch the Cougars and realize that they are a one man team, much like Davidson was in 2008. And eventually, that catches up with you. Now, don’t get me wrong, there are some pieces of the Cougars puzzle who are better than the complimentary pieces on that Davidson team. And I think that as a college player, Jimmer Fredette is better than Stephen Curry was. That Davidson team couldn’t do what last year’s Butler team could because when they went up against a deep team (Kansas) they couldn’t match-up for the full game. The same fate awaits BYU. And Elite 8 loss to Kansas. BYU is eliminated.

Overall offensive sluggishness is not. Every year, we talk about Pittsburgh as a Final Four team. They’re tough and physical. They wear you down. And every year, they get outplayed by a smaller, quicker, fresher team who hasn’t spent their entire season playing attrition basketball. The same thing will happen this year. Pittsburgh’s good enough to beat anyone in one game. In a tournament, they’re not. Pittsburgh is eliminated.

So that leaves San Diego State and Syracuse. And that’s where it gets hard to predict. If the Syracuse team that won in Hartford on Wednesday shows up to the tourney, I like Syracuse. They have an inside game and a decent outside game. They play good defense. When they’re on. But if the Syracuse team that got blown out by Seton Hall shows up then I think they’re this year’s Georgetown. They’ll lose to Cleveland State in Round 1 (or 2 because of this year’s stupid 68 team field). You can’t afford to be inconsistent in March. Syracuse is eliminated.

Ultimately, I like San Diego State as that fourth team. And I know that it sounds crazy to your east coast brain. But trust me, as someone who’s watched more Mountain West basketball this season than you’d care to, that conference is really really good. I plan my Wednesday night around the CBS College Sports MWC game of the week. And I do it because I like watching good basketball. Smart basketball. Basketball that’s about strategy and endurance more than it is about having 10 blue-chippers throwing alley-oops all game long. San Diego State, BYU, UNLV, and Colorado State could all make the Sweet 16. You don’t think so because you haven’t seen them play. But trust me, as your “MWC expert”, they can. Now, will all four (and a deserving New Mexico team) make the tournament? Probably not. East coast bias. It’s hard to stay up until midnight on a Wednesday to watch a basketball game being played 2000 miles away. Especially when you’ve never heard of the players. But trust me, it’s worth it. Watch San Diego State once before the MWC tournament and you’ll agree. They play better defense than anyone other than Ohio State. They’re tough and physical when they need to be. They’re deep. They’re well coached. They have a point guard in DJ Gay who will be a household name come March. They’re led by future NBA star Kawhi Leonard. Their “fatal flaw” is that they don’t shoot the ball well from the mid-range or the 3-point line. But they can overcome. If Provo, Utah was at sea level, the Aztecs would still be undefeated. They lost that game because they weren’t conditioned to play BYU’s game at a mile above sea level. They won’t have to do that in March. And because of that, I believe they’re the fourth best team in the nation. Even if the nation doesn’t know it yet.